• Lun. Ene 19th, 2026

Metro Bank under fire for £60m share bonanza for bosses

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

May 9, 2025
Metro Bank

Metro Bank is the latest London-listed company to face a backlash over its pay plans after drawing opposition to a proposal which could see top executives paid up to £60m apiece.

Sky News has learnt that Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), the influential proxy adviser, has told the high street lender’s investors to vote against its remuneration policy and a Shareholder Value Alignment Plan (SVAP) at its annual meeting on 20 May.

ISS said in a report to clients – seen by Sky News – that the share award plan had the «potential to deliver outsized rewards».

Money latest: Prospect of £2,000 water bills floated by industry regulator

«Performance is measured solely based on total shareholder return over a baseline value (80p for the May 2025 grant),» it said.

«The use of share price targets, in general, may not necessarily reflect management performance.

«Despite the remuneration committee’s explanations, overall, the company has not put forward a convincing case to support the SVAP.»

The maximum potential payouts are dependent upon Metro Bank’s stock hitting 437p – almost four times the level at which it is currently trading.

Less than two years ago, Metro Bank came close to collapse, with regulators overseeing a private bailout of the high street bank, which was established in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

This week, it released a trading update which showed that its financial and operating performance had improved markedly under Daniel Frumkin, its chief executive.

Metro Bank said: «The remuneration committee’s approach is based on the delivery of long-term growth generation and the continued turnaround of the bank.

«The proposed policy is fully aligned with shareholder’s interests and the creation of shareholder value over a sustained period.»

A source close to the company said the maximum payouts would only be triggered if its performance hit key hurdles over a five-year period.

SOURCE

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Asda-owner nears £275m deal to buy NCC’s Escode unit
Government to reveal major changes to merger probe process in UK
Starmer initiates resistance against Trump as president threatens tariffs over Greenland | UK News Sir Keir Starmer has decided to start pushing back against Donald Trump, who has threatened to impose tariffs on the UK and other European countries for supporting NATO allies. While not as defiant as President Macron, who vowed to stand firm against intimidation or threats, Starmer is challenging Trump’s actions. Starmer has invested significant political capital in building a relationship with Trump, despite their differences. The PM’s efforts to strengthen the special relationship, particularly in support of Ukraine, have been seen as successful. However, Trump’s accusations against the UK and European allies of playing a dangerous game in Greenland have strained the relationship. The UK’s decision to send military personnel to Greenland in solidarity with Denmark and NATO has not appeased Trump, who remains fixated on acquiring Greenland. Despite Starmer’s efforts and discussions with European leaders on Arctic security, Trump remains determined to pursue his goal. In an unusual turn of events, Starmer’s political opponents have supported his stance on Greenland and condemned Trump’s actions. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch also criticized Trump’s approach as «completely wrong.» Starmer pushes back against Trump as president threatens tariffs over Greenland

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

Keir Starmer had hoped to continue his «cost of living tour» this week to address voters’ concerns in this crucial election year. However, Donald Trump’s recent Greenland threat has derailed those plans. Instead, the prime minister and his team have been engaged in discussions with European allies to formulate a response to President Trump’s bold move. The threat to impose additional tariffs on goods from several European countries has significantly escalated tensions between allies regarding Greenland, leaving many shocked and frustrated. «It’s like stepping into an alternate reality,» remarked one official. The uncertainty of whether Trump will back down has added to the anxiety surrounding the situation. Currently, efforts are being made to navigate this delicate situation through diplomatic means. The focus is on understanding the intentions of the US before hastily reacting to every social media announcement. The recent threat by Trump towards Greenland may have been triggered by a misunderstanding. The decision by European NATO members to conduct a reconnaissance mission in Greenland was misinterpreted by the White House as being directed against the US, when in fact it was aimed at Russia and China. Prime Minister Meloni of Italy suggested that there was a communication issue, and that the European initiatives were not meant to be anti-American. Allies have emphasized their commitment to Arctic security as a shared interest, with the Danish exercise Arctic Endurance being a pre-coordinated effort with Allies. The misunderstanding that may have triggered Trump’s latest Greenland threat is the belief that the US wants to work unilaterally on security in the High North, rather than through NATO with European allies. President Trump has expressed a desire to annex Greenland and use it to strengthen US security, despite reassurances from the Danes that the US could expand its security presence on the island. This unilateral approach may be seen as undermining NATO and other international institutions, as Trump also seeks to create a Board of Peace for Gaza with funding requirements for member countries. Trump’s Greenland threat stems from a misunderstanding