• Mar. Jun 24th, 2025

fifebusinessjournal.co.uk

fifebusinessjournal.co.uk

vj

  • Inicio
  • There are five container ports around the Panama Canal, all of which are operated by foreign companies. Charting China’s impact on the Panama Canal reveals a crucial shortcut that saves ships from a lengthy detour around the tip of Chile. Since Panama joined the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in 2017, Chinese companies have increased their presence around the canal, prompting concerns about Beijing’s influence. The US has been particularly critical of Chinese control over ports near the canal, although this predates the BRI. The largest container ports at either end of the canal, Cristóbal and Balboa, have been operated by a subsidiary of a Hong Kong-based company since 1997. While this company is independent, experts warn that in times of conflict, China could leverage its influence over Hong Kong-based firms. Chinese involvement in other projects around the canal, such as the construction of new bridges and terminals, has also attracted attention. Despite these developments, Panamanian authorities have recently halted several high-profile Chinese-led projects, indicating a complex relationship between Panama, China, and the United States. Mapping China’s Influence in the Panama Canal Tracing China’s impact on the Panama Canal

You missed

Sir Keir Starmer remains determined to implement controversial benefit cuts, despite facing criticism from fellow Labour figure Sir Sadiq Khan. The prime minister defended the proposed reforms, which aim to reduce the welfare bill by £5bn annually by 2030, citing a «clear moral case» for the changes. The backlash against the cuts has been significant, with over 100 Labour MPs signing an amendment that could effectively block the legislation. Initially, many Labour MPs supported the proposals, but concerns about the impact on the most vulnerable have led to a shift in opinion. Sir Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, has joined the chorus of dissent, calling for a «rethink» of the plans, which he believes will harm disabled Londoners’ financial safety net. However, the prime minister, speaking from the NATO summit, reiterated the need for welfare system reform, arguing that the current system is not effective. Despite the opposition, the prime minister emphasized the importance of reforming the system to better serve the future. He stated that leaving the system unchanged is not an option and that Labour’s focus is on making it more suitable for the times ahead. In response to the prime minister’s comments, Sir Sadiq stressed the need for additional support to help people transition from benefits to work. He expressed concerns about the impact of the proposed changes on vulnerable and disabled individuals in London, urging the government to reassess the potential hardships that may arise. Sir Sadiq called for urgent reconsideration of the plans and emphasized the importance of providing employment and training support before any benefits are cut. The debate over the welfare cuts continues, with both sides standing firm in their positions. Sir Keir Starmer stands firm on welfare cuts as Sir Sadiq Khan criticizes proposals