• Lun. Ene 19th, 2026

Dads – want to take more time off to look after the baby?

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

Ago 15, 2014

THE world’s changing. From having no rights to spend time with their newborns a few years ago, dads now have significant rights to take time off work and get a minimum amount of pay. What’s more, dads’ rights are becoming nearly the same as mums.

Just think where we have come from. In the old days, a mum got no maternity leave from her work and in many cases even had to give up her job when she got pregnant. Over the last 30 years, mums have been given more and more maternity leave rights and pay. Now they can have 1 year off work, and 9 months’ (39 weeks’) statutory maternity pay (SMP), currently £138.18 a week, or 90 per cent of average weekly earnings if that is less than SMP. If average normal pay is higher than SMP, the first 6 weeks of leave is paid at 90 per cent of normal pay. Some employers – usually bigger companies or public sector organisations – are more generous with the pay.

Only since 2003 have dads get in on the action. But only in a small way to start with. They were given the right to 2 weeks off around the time of the childbirth which had to be taken in a one week or two week block. Unlike mums during the first few weeks, they are only entitled to the statutory pay, not 90 per cent of their normal pay. The paternity rights also apply to adoptions.

Things changed significantly in 2011. Since then, dads can take up to 26 weeks’ extra paternity leave, starting from 20 weeks after childbirth and up until the child’s first birthday. The child’s mum must have gone back to work and have stopped receiving SMP. Dads will then get the remainder of the statutory pay up until the end of the 39 week statutory pay period. They have to give 8 weeks’ notice to their employer and must give certain details about the date of childbirth, the relationship to the mother and that the leave is to take care of the child.

The latest proposal is that the dads will be able to take up most of the joint maternity/paternity leave during the first year other than the first two weeks after childbirth, where the mum is the main breadwinner. This proposal is due to come into effect in 2015, although it has stalled in government.

How many fathers are taking advantage of these new rights? In a 2013 survey by Opinion Matters, 40 per cent of dads chose not to take any paternity leave at all. The same survey showed that dads wanted more flexibility from work and the ability to work part time, but that they have real concerns about damaging their prospects at work and the social stigma attached to working less and spending more time looking after the children.

But put another way, this means that 60 per cent of dads do choose to take paternity leave. This shows that laws can change habits and attitudes. We may not be at Scandinavian levels of stay-at-home dads just yet, but we’ve moved a long way in 13 years and this trend is set to continue. Will you be take your full paternity leave?

Ben Thornber is an employment law specialist at Thornber Employment Law, based in Dunfermline.

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

Keir Starmer had hoped to continue his «cost of living tour» this week to address voters’ concerns in this crucial election year. However, Donald Trump’s recent Greenland threat has derailed those plans. Instead, the prime minister and his team have been engaged in discussions with European allies to formulate a response to President Trump’s bold move. The threat to impose additional tariffs on goods from several European countries has significantly escalated tensions between allies regarding Greenland, leaving many shocked and frustrated. «It’s like stepping into an alternate reality,» remarked one official. The uncertainty of whether Trump will back down has added to the anxiety surrounding the situation. Currently, efforts are being made to navigate this delicate situation through diplomatic means. The focus is on understanding the intentions of the US before hastily reacting to every social media announcement. The recent threat by Trump towards Greenland may have been triggered by a misunderstanding. The decision by European NATO members to conduct a reconnaissance mission in Greenland was misinterpreted by the White House as being directed against the US, when in fact it was aimed at Russia and China. Prime Minister Meloni of Italy suggested that there was a communication issue, and that the European initiatives were not meant to be anti-American. Allies have emphasized their commitment to Arctic security as a shared interest, with the Danish exercise Arctic Endurance being a pre-coordinated effort with Allies. The misunderstanding that may have triggered Trump’s latest Greenland threat is the belief that the US wants to work unilaterally on security in the High North, rather than through NATO with European allies. President Trump has expressed a desire to annex Greenland and use it to strengthen US security, despite reassurances from the Danes that the US could expand its security presence on the island. This unilateral approach may be seen as undermining NATO and other international institutions, as Trump also seeks to create a Board of Peace for Gaza with funding requirements for member countries. Trump’s Greenland threat stems from a misunderstanding