• Lun. Ene 19th, 2026

Boohoo rebrands as Debenhams Group amid strategic review

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

Mar 11, 2025
FILE PHOTO: Debenhams logo is seen on smartphone in front of a displayed Boohoo logo in this illustration taken January 25, 2021. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

Boohoo, the struggling online fashion retailer, has rebranded itself as Debenhams Group.

The company, which has been embroiled in a dispute with its major shareholder Mike Ashley’s Frasers Group regarding direction and performance, initiated a strategic review last year following the departure of CEO John Lyttle.

His successor, Dan Finley, declared on Tuesday that the transformation of Debenhams is now complete, with the updated business model of the online department store contributing significantly to the group’s profitability.

Money latest: Airline refuses refund to nut allergy sufferer refused travel

Boohoo obtained only the name and website operations from administrators after the collapse of debt-ridden Debenhams in 2020, which had 123 stores and 12,000 employees, due to COVID-related shutdowns impacting the economy.

Frasers was the largest shareholder but suffered losses when its attempts were thwarted.

Following this setback, Frasers increased its stake in Boohoo, and in January of this year, failed in its bid to remove Boohoo’s co-founder and mastermind behind the Debenhams acquisition, Mahmud Kamani, from the board.

Image:
Mike Ashley was the largest shareholder in Debenhams before its collapse and is Boohoo’s largest investor. Pic: Reuters

Boohoo’s rebranding comes in the wake of a significant decline in its fortunes due to various challenges.

While it was initially a major player in the online fast fashion market, its market value has plummeted since acquiring the Debenhams brand in 2021.

Its current value is approximately £340 million, a sharp drop from its peak above £5 billion.

In addition to facing stiff competition, including from lower-priced competitors, Boohoo has grappled with disruptions in its supply chain and increased returns.

To enhance profitability, the company has focused on cost-cutting measures, including job reductions.

Boohoo stated that the Debenhams model, which is marketplace-led, stock-lite, and capital-lite, has been instrumental in turning its fortunes around.

«Our ongoing business assessment has revealed that Debenhams, its business model, and its technology are central to the future of our group,» Boohoo remarked.

It also outlined a clear path for Debenhams to evolve into a multi-billion-pound business in the medium term, with a core earnings margin on net sales of approximately 20%.

Read more from Sky News:
UK recruiters linked to tax avoidance
‘Seismic’ planning system reforms

Boohoo also announced that Phil Ellis, the current finance director of Debenhams and managing director of DebenhamsPay+, will assume the role of group chief financial officer and join the board.

He will be replacing Stephen Morana with immediate effect.

Initially, investors expressed concerns as shares dropped by over 6% at the opening, but they later rebounded positively.

Matt Britzman, senior equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, commented on the update, stating: «It’s no secret that Boohoo has been facing challenges, and a name change does not alter the fact that sales are declining, down 16% according to the brief trading update included at the end of today’s release.

«Reviving the group’s youth fashion brands presents a significant challenge, and it remains uncertain whether reintroducing a legacy brand name will significantly impact the situation.»

SOURCE

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Keir Starmer had hoped to continue his «cost of living tour» this week to address voters’ concerns in this crucial election year. However, Donald Trump’s recent Greenland threat has derailed those plans. Instead, the prime minister and his team have been engaged in discussions with European allies to formulate a response to President Trump’s bold move. The threat to impose additional tariffs on goods from several European countries has significantly escalated tensions between allies regarding Greenland, leaving many shocked and frustrated. «It’s like stepping into an alternate reality,» remarked one official. The uncertainty of whether Trump will back down has added to the anxiety surrounding the situation. Currently, efforts are being made to navigate this delicate situation through diplomatic means. The focus is on understanding the intentions of the US before hastily reacting to every social media announcement. The recent threat by Trump towards Greenland may have been triggered by a misunderstanding. The decision by European NATO members to conduct a reconnaissance mission in Greenland was misinterpreted by the White House as being directed against the US, when in fact it was aimed at Russia and China. Prime Minister Meloni of Italy suggested that there was a communication issue, and that the European initiatives were not meant to be anti-American. Allies have emphasized their commitment to Arctic security as a shared interest, with the Danish exercise Arctic Endurance being a pre-coordinated effort with Allies. The misunderstanding that may have triggered Trump’s latest Greenland threat is the belief that the US wants to work unilaterally on security in the High North, rather than through NATO with European allies. President Trump has expressed a desire to annex Greenland and use it to strengthen US security, despite reassurances from the Danes that the US could expand its security presence on the island. This unilateral approach may be seen as undermining NATO and other international institutions, as Trump also seeks to create a Board of Peace for Gaza with funding requirements for member countries. Trump’s Greenland threat stems from a misunderstanding
Conservative MP Andrew Rosindell joins Reform UK, becoming second Tory to defect
Water supply issues persist for thousands in Kent following recent outage

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

Keir Starmer had hoped to continue his «cost of living tour» this week to address voters’ concerns in this crucial election year. However, Donald Trump’s recent Greenland threat has derailed those plans. Instead, the prime minister and his team have been engaged in discussions with European allies to formulate a response to President Trump’s bold move. The threat to impose additional tariffs on goods from several European countries has significantly escalated tensions between allies regarding Greenland, leaving many shocked and frustrated. «It’s like stepping into an alternate reality,» remarked one official. The uncertainty of whether Trump will back down has added to the anxiety surrounding the situation. Currently, efforts are being made to navigate this delicate situation through diplomatic means. The focus is on understanding the intentions of the US before hastily reacting to every social media announcement. The recent threat by Trump towards Greenland may have been triggered by a misunderstanding. The decision by European NATO members to conduct a reconnaissance mission in Greenland was misinterpreted by the White House as being directed against the US, when in fact it was aimed at Russia and China. Prime Minister Meloni of Italy suggested that there was a communication issue, and that the European initiatives were not meant to be anti-American. Allies have emphasized their commitment to Arctic security as a shared interest, with the Danish exercise Arctic Endurance being a pre-coordinated effort with Allies. The misunderstanding that may have triggered Trump’s latest Greenland threat is the belief that the US wants to work unilaterally on security in the High North, rather than through NATO with European allies. President Trump has expressed a desire to annex Greenland and use it to strengthen US security, despite reassurances from the Danes that the US could expand its security presence on the island. This unilateral approach may be seen as undermining NATO and other international institutions, as Trump also seeks to create a Board of Peace for Gaza with funding requirements for member countries. Trump’s Greenland threat stems from a misunderstanding