• Vie. Ago 1st, 2025

fifebusinessjournal.co.uk

fifebusinessjournal.co.uk

Two more suspects arrested in connection with great-grandparents’ murder in St Helens arson case

PorStaff

Jul 31, 2025
Eric Greener and Sheila Jackson. Pic: Merseyside Police

Two additional individuals have been apprehended in connection with the tragic deaths of elderly great-grandparents who perished in a devastating arson assault at their residence in St Helens.

Eric Greener, aged 77, and Sheila Jackson, aged 83, succumbed to the inferno in the early hours of July 15.

Merseyside Police announced on Thursday that a 33-year-old man from Aigburth was detained on suspicions of conspiracy to commit murder and possession of cannabis.

He has been transported to a police station for interrogation.

Image:
Sheila Jackson. Pic: Merseyside Police

A 36-year-old female from Everton was taken into custody on suspicions of conspiracy to commit murder and arson. She has been granted conditional bail.

Lee Owens, aged 46, with no fixed address, has been formally accused of two counts of murder and arson with intent to endanger life. He has been detained in custody and is scheduled to appear at Liverpool Crown Court on November 28.

Eric Greener. Pic: Merseyside Police

Image:
Eric Greener. Pic: Merseyside Police

Detective Chief Inspector Steve McGrath conveyed, «Significant advancements have been achieved, yet I also urge anyone with pertinent information to step forward if they have not already done so.

«Please refrain from presuming that we are already aware of something that could be a crucial puzzle piece. Let us conduct the evaluation and take the necessary measures.»

A 31-year-old male from St Helens, who was arrested on murder suspicions, remains under conditional bail.

A 48-year-old female of no fixed abode, a 53-year-old female from Anfield, and a 45-year-old male from Liverpool, all apprehended on suspicions of conspiracy to commit murder and arson, have been granted conditional bail.

SOURCE

Por Staff

What is the car finance scandal – and what could today’s ruling mean for motorists? The UK’s Supreme Court is poised to deliver a groundbreaking ruling today with potentially billions of pounds at stake for banks and millions of motorists. The crucial issue before the country’s highest court is whether customers should be fully informed about the commission dealers earn on their purchases. However, it’s important to note that the Supreme Court is currently only addressing one of two parallel cases concerning the mis-selling of car finance. Here is a breakdown of both cases and how today’s ruling may impact any future compensation scheme. The first case under consideration by the Supreme Court revolves around complaints regarding the non-disclosure of commission, which affects 99% of car finance cases. Essentially, when individuals purchase a car on finance, they are essentially loaned the money which they then pay off in monthly installments. Brokers, who facilitate the finance plans, earn money through a commission, which is a percentage of the interest payments. Last year, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of three motorists who were unaware that car dealerships they entered finance deals with were receiving a 25% commission, which was added to their bills without their knowledge. The ruling deemed it unlawful for car dealers to receive commissions from lenders without obtaining the customer’s informed consent. However, British lender Close Brothers and South Africa’s FirstRand appealed the decision, leading to the case being escalated to the Supreme Court. The second case, driven by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), involves discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) where brokers and dealers increased interest rates without informing buyers, resulting in higher commissions. This practice was banned by the FCA in 2021, but many consumers have since complained about being overcharged before the ban. The Financial Ombudsman Service has reported handling 20,000 complaints related to this issue. In January 2024, the FCA announced a review into the potential overcharging of motor finance customers due to past use of DCAs. Car finance scandal ruling implications for motorists
Drone incidents in UK prisons increase by over 40%
3-year-old girl found dead in Leeds home, sparking murder investigation

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

What is the car finance scandal – and what could today’s ruling mean for motorists? The UK’s Supreme Court is poised to deliver a groundbreaking ruling today with potentially billions of pounds at stake for banks and millions of motorists. The crucial issue before the country’s highest court is whether customers should be fully informed about the commission dealers earn on their purchases. However, it’s important to note that the Supreme Court is currently only addressing one of two parallel cases concerning the mis-selling of car finance. Here is a breakdown of both cases and how today’s ruling may impact any future compensation scheme. The first case under consideration by the Supreme Court revolves around complaints regarding the non-disclosure of commission, which affects 99% of car finance cases. Essentially, when individuals purchase a car on finance, they are essentially loaned the money which they then pay off in monthly installments. Brokers, who facilitate the finance plans, earn money through a commission, which is a percentage of the interest payments. Last year, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of three motorists who were unaware that car dealerships they entered finance deals with were receiving a 25% commission, which was added to their bills without their knowledge. The ruling deemed it unlawful for car dealers to receive commissions from lenders without obtaining the customer’s informed consent. However, British lender Close Brothers and South Africa’s FirstRand appealed the decision, leading to the case being escalated to the Supreme Court. The second case, driven by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), involves discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) where brokers and dealers increased interest rates without informing buyers, resulting in higher commissions. This practice was banned by the FCA in 2021, but many consumers have since complained about being overcharged before the ban. The Financial Ombudsman Service has reported handling 20,000 complaints related to this issue. In January 2024, the FCA announced a review into the potential overcharging of motor finance customers due to past use of DCAs. Car finance scandal ruling implications for motorists