• Vie. Ago 1st, 2025

fifebusinessjournal.co.uk

fifebusinessjournal.co.uk

Pubgoers near Clifton Suspension Bridge were left deeply disturbed after unknowingly offering to assist a double murderer in transporting the victims’ remains, police have disclosed. Yostin Andres Mosquera was found guilty on Monday of the brutal killings of Paul Longworth and Albert Alfonso in west London on 8 July 2024. Following the gruesome act, their decapitated heads were stored in a freezer, while the rest of their bodies were packed into suitcases. On 10 July, Mosquera hired a van with a driver to take him and the suitcases to Clifton Suspension Bridge. Detective Chief Inspector Ollie Stride of the Metropolitan Police revealed that bystanders, who had been at a nearby pub watching a football match, offered to help Mosquera by suggesting to drive him over the bridge as they noticed he was struggling with the heavy bags. Despite their good intentions, they were unaware of the sinister contents within the suitcases. Detective Inspector Neil Meade of Avon and Somerset Police explained that the pubgoers attempted to load the suitcases into their car but found them too heavy. Eventually, they assisted Mosquera in ordering a taxi using Google Translate due to a language barrier. «It was only later that they understood the true nature of the situation, leaving them deeply affected by the incident,» stated DCI Stride. The prosecution contended that Mosquera had planned to dispose of the bodies by throwing them off the bridge in Bristol. However, his ruse was uncovered when passers-by noticed blood seeping from the bags, despite Mosquera claiming they contained car parts. A vigilant cyclist confronted Mosquera about the suitcases and pursued him as he attempted to escape. The cyclist managed to capture footage of Mosquera on his phone, which Det Insp Meade described as crucial evidence for the investigation. «The cyclist’s quick thinking provided us with a starting point for our investigation. It was an exceptional contribution from a member of the public,» he commended. Pubgoers shocked after mistakenly offering to help killer with victims’ remains in suitcases

PorStaff

Jul 21, 2025

Members of the public have been left «traumatised» after mistakenly offering to help drive a double murderer over a bridge where he planned to dump the victims’ bodies, police have revealed.

Warning: This article contains graphic descriptions of murders.

Yostin Andres Mosquera was convicted on Monday of the murders of Paul Longworth and Albert Alfonso, who were killed in west London on 8 July 2024.

After decapitating their bodies, the heads were stored in a freezer, while the other remains were put in suitcases.

Image:
Clifton Suspension Bridge. File pic: PA

Yostin Andres Mosquera with Albert Alfonso and Paul Longworth .

Image:
(L-R) Yostin Andres Mosquera murdered Albert Alfonso and Paul Longworth

On 10 July, Mosquera hired a van with a driver to transport him and the bags to Clifton Suspension Bridge.

Detective Chief Inspector Ollie Stride, from the Metropolitan Police, said people who had been watching a football match in a nearby pub, came outside and tried to help Mosquera, by offering to drive him over the bridge as they saw he was struggling with the heavy suitcases.

«He told them he wanted to go to the other side of the bridge, which was only 150 yards from where he stood, but he couldn’t see it,» Detective Inspector Neil Meade, from Avon and Somerset Police, said.

«They tried loading the suitcases into the back of their car and one of them commented: ‘God, these are heavy, is there a body in there?'»

DCI Stride said they «simply couldn’t lift them into the cars so… they helped him order the taxi, that took him over using Google Translate because they couldn’t communicate with him, [as] he spoke in Spanish».

He added: «They’ve been really traumatised by the whole thing, obviously now understanding what had happened afterwards.»

The prosecution argued Mosquera went to Bristol with the intention of throwing the bags off the bridge.

But Mosquera caught the attention of passers-by, telling them the cases contained car parts.

However, people noticed liquid leaking from the bags – which was blood.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Suitcase murders: DCI describes ‘shocking’ evidence

A cyclist challenged Mosquera about the suitcases and chased after the double killer as he fled down a hill – filming him on his phone.

Det Insp Meade praised the cyclist and said the image he took of Mosquera was «critical» for the investigation.

«It gave us a lead to start with,» he said.

«It was an unbelievable piece of work by that member of the public.

Members of the public have been left «traumatised» after mistakenly offering to help drive a double murderer over a bridge where he planned to dump the victims’ bodies, police have revealed.

Warning: This article contains graphic descriptions of murders.

Yostin Andres Mosquera was convicted on Monday of the murders of Paul Longworth and Albert Alfonso, who were killed in west London on 8 July 2024.

After decapitating their bodies, the heads were stored in a freezer, while the other remains were put in suitcases.

Clifton Suspension Bridge, where the killer Yostin Andres Mosquera is thought to have planned to dispose of two bodies. File pic: PA

Image:
Clifton Suspension Bridge. File pic: PA

Yostin Andres Mosquera with Albert Alfonso and Paul Longworth .

Image:
(L-R) Yostin Andres Mosquera murdered Albert Alfonso and Paul Longworth

On 10 July, Mosquera hired a van with a driver to transport him and the bags to Clifton Suspension Bridge.

Detective Chief Inspector Ollie Stride, from the Metropolitan Police, said people who had been watching a football match in a nearby pub, came outside and tried to help Mosquera, by offering to drive him over the bridge as they saw he was struggling with the heavy suitcases.

«He told them he wanted to go to the other side of the bridge, which was only 150 yards from where he stood, but he couldn’t see it,» Detective Inspector Neil Meade, from Avon and Somerset Police, said.

«They tried loading the suitcases into the back of their car and one of them commented: ‘God, these are heavy, is there a body in there?'»

DCI Stride said they «simply couldn’t lift them into the cars so…

It was incredibly brave for the cyclist to intervene and have the presence of mind to get that footage on his phone.»

Police officers then attended the bridge and had to open the suitcases, which contained the torsos and limbs of Mr Alfonso and Mr Longworth.

Det Insp Meade said: «When you sign up to join the police, you expect to see stuff that people in general society wouldn’t see.

«But nobody can prepare anybody, cop or not a cop, to see what those officers saw that night.

«I’ve been doing this job for 29 years and I’ve never had to open a suitcase, not knowing what’s in it, and there being a body in there.»

Mosquera had already run off and was later arrested at Bristol Temple Meads station on 13 July 2024 and charged with both murders.

Members of the public were left traumatized after inadvertently helping a double murderer transport victims’ bodies over a bridge, as revealed by the police. Yostin Andres Mosquera was found guilty of murdering Paul Longworth and Albert Alfonso on July 8, 2024, in west London. Following the decapitation of the victims, their heads were stored in a freezer while the rest of their remains were placed in suitcases.

The individuals who assisted Mosquera in ordering a taxi to transport him over the bridge were unable to communicate with him as he spoke Spanish. They resorted to using Google Translate to facilitate the process. This act left them deeply affected by the realization of what had transpired.

The prosecution asserted that Mosquera had gone to Bristol with the intention of discarding the bags containing the victims’ remains off the bridge. Despite Mosquera’s claims that the cases held car parts, passers-by noticed liquid seeping from the bags, later identified as blood.

A cyclist confronted Mosquera about the suitcases and pursued him as he attempted to flee down a hill. The cyclist filmed Mosquera on his phone, providing crucial evidence for the investigation. Detective Inspector Meade commended the cyclist for his bravery and quick thinking in capturing the footage.

Police officers arrived at the bridge and had to open the suitcases, revealing the torsos and limbs of Mr. Alfonso and Mr. Longworth. The discovery was described as deeply disturbing by Detective Inspector Meade, highlighting the unprecedented nature of the situation.

Mosquera managed to escape but was apprehended at Bristol Temple Meads station on July 13, 2024, and charged with both murders. Detective Inspector Meade emphasized the shocking and traumatic nature of the events that unfolded that night, underscoring the challenges faced by law enforcement in such harrowing circumstances.

The ordeal left members of the public and law enforcement profoundly affected by the gruesome discovery and subsequent investigation. The courage and quick action of individuals like the cyclist were instrumental in bringing Mosquera to justice and shedding light on the heinous crimes he committed.

The investigation into the murders of Paul Longworth and Albert Alfonso was a testament to the dedication and perseverance of law enforcement in seeking justice for the victims and their families. The events that transpired serve as a reminder of the darkness that exists in society and the importance of vigilance and cooperation in combating such atrocities. File image: Yostin Andres Mosquera with Albert Alfonso and Paul Longworth.

SOURCE

Por Staff

What is the car finance scandal – and what could today’s ruling mean for motorists? The UK’s Supreme Court is poised to deliver a groundbreaking ruling today with potentially billions of pounds at stake for banks and millions of motorists. The crucial issue before the country’s highest court is whether customers should be fully informed about the commission dealers earn on their purchases. However, it’s important to note that the Supreme Court is currently only addressing one of two parallel cases concerning the mis-selling of car finance. Here is a breakdown of both cases and how today’s ruling may impact any future compensation scheme. The first case under consideration by the Supreme Court revolves around complaints regarding the non-disclosure of commission, which affects 99% of car finance cases. Essentially, when individuals purchase a car on finance, they are essentially loaned the money which they then pay off in monthly installments. Brokers, who facilitate the finance plans, earn money through a commission, which is a percentage of the interest payments. Last year, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of three motorists who were unaware that car dealerships they entered finance deals with were receiving a 25% commission, which was added to their bills without their knowledge. The ruling deemed it unlawful for car dealers to receive commissions from lenders without obtaining the customer’s informed consent. However, British lender Close Brothers and South Africa’s FirstRand appealed the decision, leading to the case being escalated to the Supreme Court. The second case, driven by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), involves discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) where brokers and dealers increased interest rates without informing buyers, resulting in higher commissions. This practice was banned by the FCA in 2021, but many consumers have since complained about being overcharged before the ban. The Financial Ombudsman Service has reported handling 20,000 complaints related to this issue. In January 2024, the FCA announced a review into the potential overcharging of motor finance customers due to past use of DCAs. Car finance scandal ruling implications for motorists
Drone incidents in UK prisons increase by over 40%
3-year-old girl found dead in Leeds home, sparking murder investigation

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

What is the car finance scandal – and what could today’s ruling mean for motorists? The UK’s Supreme Court is poised to deliver a groundbreaking ruling today with potentially billions of pounds at stake for banks and millions of motorists. The crucial issue before the country’s highest court is whether customers should be fully informed about the commission dealers earn on their purchases. However, it’s important to note that the Supreme Court is currently only addressing one of two parallel cases concerning the mis-selling of car finance. Here is a breakdown of both cases and how today’s ruling may impact any future compensation scheme. The first case under consideration by the Supreme Court revolves around complaints regarding the non-disclosure of commission, which affects 99% of car finance cases. Essentially, when individuals purchase a car on finance, they are essentially loaned the money which they then pay off in monthly installments. Brokers, who facilitate the finance plans, earn money through a commission, which is a percentage of the interest payments. Last year, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of three motorists who were unaware that car dealerships they entered finance deals with were receiving a 25% commission, which was added to their bills without their knowledge. The ruling deemed it unlawful for car dealers to receive commissions from lenders without obtaining the customer’s informed consent. However, British lender Close Brothers and South Africa’s FirstRand appealed the decision, leading to the case being escalated to the Supreme Court. The second case, driven by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), involves discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) where brokers and dealers increased interest rates without informing buyers, resulting in higher commissions. This practice was banned by the FCA in 2021, but many consumers have since complained about being overcharged before the ban. The Financial Ombudsman Service has reported handling 20,000 complaints related to this issue. In January 2024, the FCA announced a review into the potential overcharging of motor finance customers due to past use of DCAs. Car finance scandal ruling implications for motorists