Rewrite
Changes to welfare reforms, mandated by dissenting Labour MPs, are being unveiled today ahead of a critical vote.
The initial legislation limited eligibility for the personal independence payment (PIP) and reduced the health-related component of universal credit (UC).
The government, citing unsustainable welfare costs, was compelled to reverse course after 126 Labour backbenchers supported an amendment that would have stopped the bill in its tracks at the first Commons hurdle.
Explainer: What are the welfare concessions?
Although the amendment is anticipated to be withdrawn following modifications that satisfied some Labour MPs, others remain dissatisfied and are contemplating supporting a similar amendment to be proposed today.
Here are the main changes to the UC and PIP bill:
• current PIP claimants will keep their benefits; stricter eligibility requirements will only apply to new claims from November 2026
• a review of the PIP assessment, which will have input from disabled people
• existing recipients of the health-related element of UC will have their incomes protected in real terms
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said in a statement that the legislation now aims to deliver a «fairer, more compassionate system» ahead of the second reading and vote on Tuesday.
«We must build a welfare system that provides security for those who cannot work and the right support for those who can. Too often, disabled people feel trapped, worried that if they try to work, they could lose the support they depend on.
«That is why we are taking action to remove those barriers, support disabled people to live with dignity and independence, and open routes into employment for those who want to pursue it.
«This is about delivering a fairer, more compassionate system as part of our Plan for Change which supports people to thrive, whatever their circumstances.»
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall insists welfare reforms will create ‘a fairer, more compassionate system’. Pic: PA
On Saturday, Sir Keir Starmer said fixing the UK’s welfare system was a «moral imperative». The government claimed cuts to sickness and disability benefits would shave £5bn off the welfare bill and get more people into work.
The Resolution Foundation believes the concessions could cost as much as £3bn, while the Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that the changes make tax rises more likely.
Read more:
Starmer’s most damaging U-turn yet
Liz Kendall defends welfare retreat
👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈
Health Secretary Wes Streeting told Sky News that welfare bill changes have put Labour in a much better position ahead of tomorrow’s vote.
On Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, Mr Streeting said: «There were things that we didn’t get right, we’ve put right, and there’ll be a debate about future amendments and things, I’m sure, as it goes through in the usual way.»
Talking to Sky News about the welfare reforms, Health Secretary Wes Streeting said there were things Labour ‘didn’t get right’
On the same programme, shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately repeatedly refused to say whether the Conservatives would back the bill, but would review the proposals after the minister’s statement later.
«We have said that if there are more savings that actually bring the welfare bill down, if they’ll get more people into work, and if they commit to using the savings to avoid tax cuts in the autumn, which looks highly unlikely at the moment, then they have our support.»
The Liberal Democrats plan to vote against the bill and have called for the government to speed up access-to-work decisions to help people enter the workforce.
without altering any of the links or their attributes.
SOURCE