Janet Skinner, a victim of the Post Office Horizon IT scandal, is pursuing legal action against the government-owned organization in her quest for full compensation for her wrongful conviction. Janet Skinner, a former subpostmistress, is one of the few victims to take the Post Office to court. Despite her conviction being overturned in 2021, she has not yet received a final payment and has only been offered an insufficient interim sum. Her lawyer, Simon Goldberg, stated that she has been «forced» to sue the Post Office after facing delays and inadequate offers. Janet Skinner’s legal action aims to bring closure to her long-standing fight for justice. Janet Skinner seeks justice from Post Office for wrongful conviction
A victim of the Post Office Horizon IT scandal is taking legal action against the government-owned organisation as she seeks full redress for her wrongful conviction.
Janet Skinner is believed to be only the second victim to sue the Post Office.
The former subpostmistress has been «forced» to take the state-owned business to court, her solicitor told Sky News.
Money blog: Oil hit lowest since 2021 with possible impact on filling your car
Ms Skinner has been a campaigner for victims of the faulty Horizon software for nearly two decades.
Around 1,000 people were wrongly prosecuted and convicted throughout the UK between 1999 and 2015 as a result of Horizon.
Despite having her conviction for false accounting overturned in 2021, Ms Skinner has yet to receive a final payment, has been given an insufficient interim sum and is being asked for six different expert reports, said lawyer Simon Goldberg.
More on Post Office Scandal
Ms Skinner is taking legal action in an attempt to see the issue resolved.
«There’s no sign of resolution. We’re only forced to do it because enough is enough,» Mr Goldberg said.
«It’s cruel and traumatic beyond belief that she should still have to be fighting.»
Ms Skinner’s claim should have been settled within 12 months of the conviction being overturned, he said.
Mr Goldberg added the interim offers are not in keeping with the recommendations of retired High Court judge Sir Wyn Williams, who presided over the public inquiry into the scandal.
Both the Post Office and the Department for Business and Trade, which administers all but one of the victims’ redress schemes, said in October they would «always apply a generous approach» to assessing redress.
But Ms Skinner was initially offered a payment worth only 15% of her total claim.
«They’ve [claim assessors] clearly tried to grind her down and make her give up, and we’re not playing,» her solicitor said.
Janet Skinner speaking to Sky News in January 2024.
More legal action to come?
While Ms Skinner is believed to be only the second victim to launch a civil case against the Post Office, she may not be the last.
A postmaster made famous after being portrayed in the ITV drama Mr Bates vs the Post Office, Lee Castleton became the first to take such action in March.
«Unless there’s a sea change, there will definitely be more claims,» Mr Goldberg said.
Image: Ms Skinner (L) after having her conviction overturned by the Court of Appeal in 2021
Ms Skinner was given a nine-month custodial sentence in 2007 after the Horizon computer programme, made by Fujitsu, incorrectly generated a £59,000 shortfall.
She was imprisoned when her two children were in their teens, released with an ankle monitor tag, and sold her house when it was due to be repossessed.
Amid the ordeal, Ms Skinner suffered a neurological collapse and was left paralysed from the neck down.
Janet Skinner, a victim of the Post Office Horizon IT scandal, is working to regain her ability to walk as she takes legal action against the government-owned organisation for full redress for her wrongful conviction.
Ms Skinner, a former subpostmistress, has been a campaigner for nearly two decades for victims of the faulty Horizon software that led to the wrongful prosecution and conviction of around 1,000 people in the UK between 1999 and 2015.
Despite having her false accounting conviction overturned in 2021, Ms Skinner has not yet received a final payment and has been given an insufficient interim sum, forcing her to seek legal action to resolve the issue.
Her solicitor, Simon Goldberg, stated that the interim offers do not align with the recommendations of retired High Court judge Sir Wyn Williams, who oversaw the public inquiry into the scandal.
Both the Post Office and the Department for Business and Trade have promised a generous approach to assessing redress, but Ms Skinner was initially offered only 15% of her total claim.
Mr Goldberg emphasized the need for resolution and criticized the delay in settling Ms Skinner’s claim, stating that it should have been resolved within 12 months of the conviction being overturned.
Ms Skinner’s legal action aims to bring closure to the issue, as her solicitor emphasized that the prolonged battle has been «cruel and traumatic beyond belief.»
The Post Office and the Department for Business and Trade have expressed their commitment to engaging fully in the legal process once the redress claim is received.
«There’s no sign of resolution. We’re only forced to do it because enough is enough,» Mr Goldberg said.
More on Post Office Scandal
Janet Skinner speaking to Sky News in January 2024. Ms Skinner is taking legal action in an attempt to see the issue resolved. With her conviction overturned in 2021, she has yet to receive a final payment and has only been given an insufficient interim sum. Additionally, she is being asked for six different expert reports, according to her lawyer Simon Goldberg.
Ms Skinner, a former subpostmistress, has been a vocal campaigner for victims of the faulty Horizon software for nearly two decades. The Horizon IT scandal led to the wrongful prosecution and conviction of around 1,000 individuals in the UK between 1999 and 2015. Despite the widespread impact of the scandal, only a few victims have taken legal action against the Post Office.
In a similar case, postmaster Lee Castleton became the first to launch a civil case against the Post Office in March. The ITV drama «Mr Bates vs the Post Office» brought attention to his story, highlighting the injustices faced by postmasters due to the Horizon system.
According to Ms Skinner’s solicitor, more victims may come forward with legal claims if there is no significant change in the handling of the situation. The lack of resolution in cases like Ms Skinner’s could prompt others to seek justice through the legal system.
Ms Skinner’s ordeal began in 2007 when the Horizon computer programme, developed by Fujitsu, incorrectly generated a £59,000 shortfall. This error led to her being sentenced to nine months in custody, during which time her two children were teenagers. She was released with an ankle monitor tag and had to sell her house to avoid repossession.
The impact of the wrongful conviction and imprisonment took a toll on Ms Skinner’s health, leading to a neurological collapse that left her paralyzed from the neck down. Overcoming this physical challenge, she had to relearn how to walk and regain her independence.
In response to the Horizon IT scandal, a Post Office spokesperson expressed regret for the devastating impact on former postmasters like Ms Skinner. The responsibility for redress claims has since shifted to the Department for Business and Trade.
While the Post Office cannot comment on ongoing legal proceedings, they have committed to engaging fully in the redress process once the claim is received. The apology from the Post Office acknowledges the suffering endured by victims of the Horizon scandal and the need for accountability and restitution.
As Ms Skinner continues her legal battle for full redress, the outcome of her case could set a precedent for other victims seeking justice against the Post Office. The fight for accountability and compensation for the harm caused by the Horizon IT scandal remains ongoing, with more potential claims on the horizon. «We’re only compelled to do this because we’ve reached a breaking point,» expressed Mr Goldberg. «It’s incredibly cruel and traumatic that she is still having to fight.» He emphasized that Ms Skinner’s claim should have been resolved within a year of her conviction being overturned. Mr Goldberg also highlighted that the interim offers do not align with the recommendations of retired High Court judge Sir Wyn Williams, who oversaw the public inquiry into the scandal.
Both the Post Office and the Department for Business and Trade, which manages most of the victims’ compensation schemes, stated in October that they would always take a generous approach to assessing compensation. However, Ms Skinner was initially offered only 15% of her total claim, which her solicitor described as an attempt to wear her down.
Regarding potential legal action, Mr Goldberg mentioned that while Ms Skinner is only the second victim to pursue a civil case against the Post Office, she may not be the last. Lee Castleton, a postmaster known from the ITV drama «Mr Bates vs the Post Office,» was the first to take such action in March. Mr Goldberg indicated that without significant change, more claims are likely to follow.
Ms Skinner’s struggles began in 2007 when she received a nine-month prison sentence due to errors in the Horizon computer program, resulting in a £59,000 discrepancy. She went through significant hardship, including imprisonment, house repossession, and a neurological collapse that left her paralyzed from the neck down.
In response to the situation, a Post Office spokesperson acknowledged the impact of the Horizon IT Scandal on individuals like Ms Skinner and offered an apology for her experiences. They stated that the responsibility for Ms Skinner’s compensation claim was transferred to the Department for Business and Trade in June 2025 and expressed willingness to engage fully in the process once the claim is received.
“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”
Para ofrecer las mejores experiencias, utilizamos tecnologías como las cookies para almacenar y/o acceder a la información del dispositivo. El consentimiento de estas tecnologías nos permitirá procesar datos como el comportamiento de navegación o las identificaciones únicas en este sitio. No consentir o retirar el consentimiento, puede afectar negativamente a ciertas características y funciones.
Funcional
Siempre activo
El almacenamiento o acceso técnico es estrictamente necesario para el propósito legítimo de permitir el uso de un servicio específico explícitamente solicitado por el abonado o usuario, o con el único propósito de llevar a cabo la transmisión de una comunicación a través de una red de comunicaciones electrónicas.
Preferencias
El almacenamiento o acceso técnico es necesario para la finalidad legítima de almacenar preferencias no solicitadas por el abonado o usuario.
Estadísticas
El almacenamiento o acceso técnico que es utilizado exclusivamente con fines estadísticos.El almacenamiento o acceso técnico que se utiliza exclusivamente con fines estadísticos anónimos. Sin un requerimiento, el cumplimiento voluntario por parte de tu proveedor de servicios de Internet, o los registros adicionales de un tercero, la información almacenada o recuperada sólo para este propósito no se puede utilizar para identificarte.
Marketing
El almacenamiento o acceso técnico es necesario para crear perfiles de usuario para enviar publicidad, o para rastrear al usuario en una web o en varias web con fines de marketing similares.