• Vie. Ago 1st, 2025

fifebusinessjournal.co.uk

fifebusinessjournal.co.uk

Henry Kelly, Going For Gold presenter, passes away at 78

PorStaff

Feb 26, 2025
Pic: Ken McKay/ITV/Shutterstock

Renowned Going For Gold presenter Henry Kelly has passed away at the age of 78, as confirmed by his family.

The Dublin-born writer and broadcaster peacefully passed away on Tuesday after a period of ill health.

«Henry will be deeply missed by his loved ones, including his partner Karolyn Shindler, their son Alexander, Henry’s daughter Siobhan, and her mother Marjorie,» they stated in a heartfelt message.

Kelly kickstarted his career in journalism in the 1960s in Dublin and later ventured into radio and TV presenting in the 1970s upon relocating to England.

During his time at University College Dublin, he wrote theatre reviews for The Irish Times and graduated with an English degree in 1968. He then became the newspaper’s northern editor, stationed in Belfast during the tumultuous 1970s, covering the peak of The Troubles.

Upon moving to London in 1976, Kelly joined the BBC Radio 4 current affairs program, The World Tonight, as a reporter and presenter. He later became a presenter on the ITV entertainment show, Game For A Laugh, in 1981, and subsequently hosted the popular BBC One game show Going For Gold for 10 seasons from the late 1980s to the mid-1990s.

Image:
Game For A Laugh’s 1980s presenters (L-R) Matthew Kelly, Sarah Kennedy, Henry Kelly and Jeremy Beadle. Pic: ITV/Shutterstock

The original show featured contestants from different countries competing for a cash prize by answering questions. The show’s theme tune was composed by the future multi-award-winning composer, Hans Zimmer.

The program was later revived by Channel 5, with participants exclusively from the UK and Ireland, and hosted by newsreader John Suchet.

Kelly (left), with Anneka Rice and Nick Owen at a BAFTA party to celebrate the 20th anniversary of TV-am in 2003. Pic: PA

Image:
Kelly (left), with Anneka Rice and Nick Owen at a BAFTA party to celebrate the 20th anniversary of TV-am in 2003. Pic: PA

Kelly also made appearances in the Victoria Wood sitcom Dinnerladies, had a stint on the morning program TV-am, and featured on the talk show After Dark.

As a founding presenter on Classic FM, he hosted a daily breakfast show from 1992 to 2003 and was honored with a Sony Radio Award in 1994 for being voted national broadcaster of the year.

Later in his radio career, Kelly hosted The Henry Kelly Show on LBC for a period and also presented on BBC Radio Berkshire from 2005 to 2015. Additionally, he authored books such as the 1972 piece «How Stormont Fell,» focusing on the events impacting the Northern Irish parliament, and co-wrote the 1990s collection «Classic FM Musical Anecdotes, Notes And Quotes» with John Foley.

SOURCE

Por Staff

What is the car finance scandal – and what could today’s ruling mean for motorists? The UK’s Supreme Court is poised to deliver a groundbreaking ruling today with potentially billions of pounds at stake for banks and millions of motorists. The crucial issue before the country’s highest court is whether customers should be fully informed about the commission dealers earn on their purchases. However, it’s important to note that the Supreme Court is currently only addressing one of two parallel cases concerning the mis-selling of car finance. Here is a breakdown of both cases and how today’s ruling may impact any future compensation scheme. The first case under consideration by the Supreme Court revolves around complaints regarding the non-disclosure of commission, which affects 99% of car finance cases. Essentially, when individuals purchase a car on finance, they are essentially loaned the money which they then pay off in monthly installments. Brokers, who facilitate the finance plans, earn money through a commission, which is a percentage of the interest payments. Last year, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of three motorists who were unaware that car dealerships they entered finance deals with were receiving a 25% commission, which was added to their bills without their knowledge. The ruling deemed it unlawful for car dealers to receive commissions from lenders without obtaining the customer’s informed consent. However, British lender Close Brothers and South Africa’s FirstRand appealed the decision, leading to the case being escalated to the Supreme Court. The second case, driven by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), involves discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) where brokers and dealers increased interest rates without informing buyers, resulting in higher commissions. This practice was banned by the FCA in 2021, but many consumers have since complained about being overcharged before the ban. The Financial Ombudsman Service has reported handling 20,000 complaints related to this issue. In January 2024, the FCA announced a review into the potential overcharging of motor finance customers due to past use of DCAs. Car finance scandal ruling implications for motorists
Drone incidents in UK prisons increase by over 40%
3-year-old girl found dead in Leeds home, sparking murder investigation

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

What is the car finance scandal – and what could today’s ruling mean for motorists? The UK’s Supreme Court is poised to deliver a groundbreaking ruling today with potentially billions of pounds at stake for banks and millions of motorists. The crucial issue before the country’s highest court is whether customers should be fully informed about the commission dealers earn on their purchases. However, it’s important to note that the Supreme Court is currently only addressing one of two parallel cases concerning the mis-selling of car finance. Here is a breakdown of both cases and how today’s ruling may impact any future compensation scheme. The first case under consideration by the Supreme Court revolves around complaints regarding the non-disclosure of commission, which affects 99% of car finance cases. Essentially, when individuals purchase a car on finance, they are essentially loaned the money which they then pay off in monthly installments. Brokers, who facilitate the finance plans, earn money through a commission, which is a percentage of the interest payments. Last year, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of three motorists who were unaware that car dealerships they entered finance deals with were receiving a 25% commission, which was added to their bills without their knowledge. The ruling deemed it unlawful for car dealers to receive commissions from lenders without obtaining the customer’s informed consent. However, British lender Close Brothers and South Africa’s FirstRand appealed the decision, leading to the case being escalated to the Supreme Court. The second case, driven by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), involves discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) where brokers and dealers increased interest rates without informing buyers, resulting in higher commissions. This practice was banned by the FCA in 2021, but many consumers have since complained about being overcharged before the ban. The Financial Ombudsman Service has reported handling 20,000 complaints related to this issue. In January 2024, the FCA announced a review into the potential overcharging of motor finance customers due to past use of DCAs. Car finance scandal ruling implications for motorists