• Lun. Ene 19th, 2026

Donald Trump has suggested reducing US trade tariffs against China to 80% ahead of upcoming peace talks between the two countries. The meeting in Switzerland, set to take place on Saturday, is seen as a crucial opportunity to ease tensions in the ongoing trade war. The stakes are high for both nations, with the domestic and global economies feeling the strain. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump indicated his support for an 80% tariff on China, leaving the decision in the hands of Scott Bessent, the US treasury secretary leading the delegation at the talks. The outcome of the discussions is highly anticipated, as current tariff levels stand at 125% on US imports to China and 145% on Chinese goods entering the US, effectively creating a trade embargo. Trade tensions between the US and China have been escalating, with President Trump suggesting a possible tariff cut to 80% on Chinese goods before upcoming negotiations.

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

May 10, 2025
Donald Trump at the White House. Pic: AP

During key peace talks between the US and China, President Donald Trump has suggested reducing US trade tariffs against China to 80%.

The meeting in Switzerland on Saturday, which will include top officials from both nations, is seen as an opportunity to alleviate the most damaging aspect of the trade war.

Both sides have much at stake, as the domestic outlook is worsening and the global economy is weakening.

In a post on his Truth Social platform, following an interim deal with the UK, President Trump wrote: «80% Tariff on China seems right! Up to Scott B [Bessent].»

The decision will ultimately rest with Scott Bessent, the US treasury secretary who will lead the delegation at the talks in Geneva.

The outcome of the talks is highly anticipated after multiple rounds of tariff increases, resulting in duties of 125% on US imports from China and 145% on Chinese goods entering the US.

These high levels effectively amount to a trade embargo due to their severity.

Please rewrite this sentence. Please rewrite this sentence for me. Could you please revise this?

SOURCE

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Asda-owner nears £275m deal to buy NCC’s Escode unit
Government to reveal major changes to merger probe process in UK
Starmer initiates resistance against Trump as president threatens tariffs over Greenland | UK News Sir Keir Starmer has decided to start pushing back against Donald Trump, who has threatened to impose tariffs on the UK and other European countries for supporting NATO allies. While not as defiant as President Macron, who vowed to stand firm against intimidation or threats, Starmer is challenging Trump’s actions. Starmer has invested significant political capital in building a relationship with Trump, despite their differences. The PM’s efforts to strengthen the special relationship, particularly in support of Ukraine, have been seen as successful. However, Trump’s accusations against the UK and European allies of playing a dangerous game in Greenland have strained the relationship. The UK’s decision to send military personnel to Greenland in solidarity with Denmark and NATO has not appeased Trump, who remains fixated on acquiring Greenland. Despite Starmer’s efforts and discussions with European leaders on Arctic security, Trump remains determined to pursue his goal. In an unusual turn of events, Starmer’s political opponents have supported his stance on Greenland and condemned Trump’s actions. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch also criticized Trump’s approach as «completely wrong.» Starmer pushes back against Trump as president threatens tariffs over Greenland

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

Keir Starmer had hoped to continue his «cost of living tour» this week to address voters’ concerns in this crucial election year. However, Donald Trump’s recent Greenland threat has derailed those plans. Instead, the prime minister and his team have been engaged in discussions with European allies to formulate a response to President Trump’s bold move. The threat to impose additional tariffs on goods from several European countries has significantly escalated tensions between allies regarding Greenland, leaving many shocked and frustrated. «It’s like stepping into an alternate reality,» remarked one official. The uncertainty of whether Trump will back down has added to the anxiety surrounding the situation. Currently, efforts are being made to navigate this delicate situation through diplomatic means. The focus is on understanding the intentions of the US before hastily reacting to every social media announcement. The recent threat by Trump towards Greenland may have been triggered by a misunderstanding. The decision by European NATO members to conduct a reconnaissance mission in Greenland was misinterpreted by the White House as being directed against the US, when in fact it was aimed at Russia and China. Prime Minister Meloni of Italy suggested that there was a communication issue, and that the European initiatives were not meant to be anti-American. Allies have emphasized their commitment to Arctic security as a shared interest, with the Danish exercise Arctic Endurance being a pre-coordinated effort with Allies. The misunderstanding that may have triggered Trump’s latest Greenland threat is the belief that the US wants to work unilaterally on security in the High North, rather than through NATO with European allies. President Trump has expressed a desire to annex Greenland and use it to strengthen US security, despite reassurances from the Danes that the US could expand its security presence on the island. This unilateral approach may be seen as undermining NATO and other international institutions, as Trump also seeks to create a Board of Peace for Gaza with funding requirements for member countries. Trump’s Greenland threat stems from a misunderstanding