• Vie. Ago 1st, 2025

fifebusinessjournal.co.uk

fifebusinessjournal.co.uk

British man convicted for offering to spy for Russia

PorStaff

Jul 22, 2025

A former City worker is facing jail after he was found guilty of volunteering to spy for the Russians when he ran out of money in retirement.

Howard Phillips, 65, from Harlow, Essex, handed over the home address and landline for Grant Shapps, his local MP and then the defence secretary, during an undercover sting by MI5.

He told two officers posing as Russian agents he wanted to work in intelligence to avoid a «nine-to-five office» job after clearing out his savings by retiring at 59.

Phillips was found guilty of assisting what he believed to be Russian intelligence service agents, in breach of the National Security Act.

Dressed in a dark suit and dark colored tie, he shook his head and looked around the court as he was found unanimously guilty by a jury at Winchester Crown Court after four hours of deliberation.

Image:
Pic: Metropolitan Police

He now faces a lengthy jail term after offering to provide logistical support for Russian agents across the world in the increasingly desperate hope it would bail him out of his money worries.

Jocelyn Ledward KC, prosecuting, said Phillips was «struggling financially» and seeking «interesting and exciting work for easy money».

Phillips, who is divorced with four grown-up children, became an insolvency practitioner in 1986 and had worked for Bond Partners in the City. He had become self-employed in 2011 and then worked as a manager in the charity sector before moving to GDPR compliance in «semi-retirement» in 2018.

Phillips explained that he sent out hundreds of CVs and applied online, adding: «I was avidly seeking employment but none was forthcoming.»

Grant Shapps.
Pic: Reuters

Image:
Phillips handed over the home address and landline for Grant Shapps (pictured). Pic: Reuters

He filled in an online application form for MI5 in 2014 and again in 2024 because he «wanted to act in the service of my country,» but found that they required a university degree.

Phillips began writing a series of increasingly fanciful letters to Conservative Party ministers, offering his advice on how to influence the electorate, and to Hollywood actors – including Tom Cruise and Jennifer Aniston – asking to meet and talk about how to get into the movie business.

However, his financial situation was «decreasing rapidly.» He had used up all the money he had gained from the sale of a property. He had a balance of £25,126.09 in his bank accounts on April 29, 2023, but by May 20, 2024, it had dropped to £374.48 after using his savings to pay off Santander credit card bills.

Howard Phillips. Pic: Metropolitan Police

Image:
Phillips as he was arrested. Pic: Metropolitan Police

Phillips was filmed from multiple angles in an elaborate undercover operation, which saw two MI5 agents adopting Russian accents to pose as agents of the SVR, Russia’s foreign intelligence agency, even though he had never heard of the organization.

On 15 March last year, Phillips volunteered his services to the Russians in a letter intercepted by MI5.

In messages on WhatsApp, he claimed his name was David Marshall and said he was a «fully pledged British citizen, born in the UK to British parents and British grandparents etc,» and had «several situations of utmost benefit to convey and offer.»

He added that he was «semi-retired» but had «connections in high places.»

Phillips was asked if he could prepare a document on a USB stick that would explain how he could assist Russian intelligence and deliver it to London on 4 April last year.

Jurors were played a covert recording of a meeting between Phillips and «Sasha» and «Dima» – two undercover MI5 officers – at the London Bridge Hotel on 26 April in which he told the men he wanted to work for Russia in exchange for financial independence from the UK.

He was arrested by plain-clothed officers in a coffee shop near King’s Cross station on 16 May last year.

Phillips denied materially assisting a foreign intelligence service to carry out UK-related activities under the National Security Act 2023.

SOURCE

Por Staff

What is the car finance scandal – and what could today’s ruling mean for motorists? The UK’s Supreme Court is poised to deliver a groundbreaking ruling today with potentially billions of pounds at stake for banks and millions of motorists. The crucial issue before the country’s highest court is whether customers should be fully informed about the commission dealers earn on their purchases. However, it’s important to note that the Supreme Court is currently only addressing one of two parallel cases concerning the mis-selling of car finance. Here is a breakdown of both cases and how today’s ruling may impact any future compensation scheme. The first case under consideration by the Supreme Court revolves around complaints regarding the non-disclosure of commission, which affects 99% of car finance cases. Essentially, when individuals purchase a car on finance, they are essentially loaned the money which they then pay off in monthly installments. Brokers, who facilitate the finance plans, earn money through a commission, which is a percentage of the interest payments. Last year, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of three motorists who were unaware that car dealerships they entered finance deals with were receiving a 25% commission, which was added to their bills without their knowledge. The ruling deemed it unlawful for car dealers to receive commissions from lenders without obtaining the customer’s informed consent. However, British lender Close Brothers and South Africa’s FirstRand appealed the decision, leading to the case being escalated to the Supreme Court. The second case, driven by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), involves discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) where brokers and dealers increased interest rates without informing buyers, resulting in higher commissions. This practice was banned by the FCA in 2021, but many consumers have since complained about being overcharged before the ban. The Financial Ombudsman Service has reported handling 20,000 complaints related to this issue. In January 2024, the FCA announced a review into the potential overcharging of motor finance customers due to past use of DCAs. Car finance scandal ruling implications for motorists
Drone incidents in UK prisons increase by over 40%
3-year-old girl found dead in Leeds home, sparking murder investigation

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

What is the car finance scandal – and what could today’s ruling mean for motorists? The UK’s Supreme Court is poised to deliver a groundbreaking ruling today with potentially billions of pounds at stake for banks and millions of motorists. The crucial issue before the country’s highest court is whether customers should be fully informed about the commission dealers earn on their purchases. However, it’s important to note that the Supreme Court is currently only addressing one of two parallel cases concerning the mis-selling of car finance. Here is a breakdown of both cases and how today’s ruling may impact any future compensation scheme. The first case under consideration by the Supreme Court revolves around complaints regarding the non-disclosure of commission, which affects 99% of car finance cases. Essentially, when individuals purchase a car on finance, they are essentially loaned the money which they then pay off in monthly installments. Brokers, who facilitate the finance plans, earn money through a commission, which is a percentage of the interest payments. Last year, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of three motorists who were unaware that car dealerships they entered finance deals with were receiving a 25% commission, which was added to their bills without their knowledge. The ruling deemed it unlawful for car dealers to receive commissions from lenders without obtaining the customer’s informed consent. However, British lender Close Brothers and South Africa’s FirstRand appealed the decision, leading to the case being escalated to the Supreme Court. The second case, driven by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), involves discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) where brokers and dealers increased interest rates without informing buyers, resulting in higher commissions. This practice was banned by the FCA in 2021, but many consumers have since complained about being overcharged before the ban. The Financial Ombudsman Service has reported handling 20,000 complaints related to this issue. In January 2024, the FCA announced a review into the potential overcharging of motor finance customers due to past use of DCAs. Car finance scandal ruling implications for motorists