• Lun. Ene 19th, 2026

Billions of pounds in spending cuts, including welfare, expected in spring statement

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

Mar 5, 2025

Anticipated in the upcoming spring statement later this month are significant spending cuts amounting to several billion pounds, including reductions from the welfare budget.

The Treasury is scheduled to present the proposed cuts to the Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) on Wednesday, preceding the financial forecast on 26 March, coinciding with Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ spring statement announcement.

Sky’s deputy political editor, Sam Coates, disclosed on the Politics at Jack and Sam’s podcast that welfare cuts are poised to be a component of the spring statement package to assist the chancellor in adhering to her borrowing limits.

Coates outlined a «four-point plan» that includes planning reform, Whitehall cuts, regulation cuts, and welfare cuts.

Following months of economic decline and geopolitical upheaval since the last October budget, Ms. Reeves finds herself nearing the end of her £9.9 billion headroom.

Her self-imposed fiscal regulations restrict her from borrowing for day-to-day expenses, leaving spending cuts as one of her limited choices.

👉Listen to Politics At Jack And Sam’s on your podcast app👈

During the weekend, Sir Keir Starmer remarked that the government is in the «early stages» of exploring whether tax increases or spending cuts are necessary to comply with Labour’s self-imposed fiscal guidelines.

The prime minister declined to confirm whether additional tax hikes or spending cuts would be implemented.

While the OBR is obligated to provide two economic forecasts annually, the chancellor stated that she would only present one budget per year to ensure stability and certainty regarding forthcoming tax adjustments.

Nevertheless, the challenging economic climate since October has forced her hand, with inflation reaching a 10-month peak at 3%, a notable increase in government bond yields, and growth falling short of expectations.

Donald Trump’s imposition of tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China – the US’ primary trading partners – this week led to retaliatory promises and a significant decline in global stock markets on Tuesday.

Although the UK has not yet been impacted by tariffs, the chancellor cautioned that the British economy would still suffer from the repercussions of the US president’s trade war, even if the UK secures a deal with the White House.

«It’s unequivocal that even without tariffs affecting the UK, we will experience the effects of sluggish global trade, slower GDP growth, and higher inflation compared to what would otherwise occur,» she informed numerous top British manufacturers at a pivotal industry conference.

SOURCE

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Asda-owner nears £275m deal to buy NCC’s Escode unit
Government to reveal major changes to merger probe process in UK
Starmer initiates resistance against Trump as president threatens tariffs over Greenland | UK News Sir Keir Starmer has decided to start pushing back against Donald Trump, who has threatened to impose tariffs on the UK and other European countries for supporting NATO allies. While not as defiant as President Macron, who vowed to stand firm against intimidation or threats, Starmer is challenging Trump’s actions. Starmer has invested significant political capital in building a relationship with Trump, despite their differences. The PM’s efforts to strengthen the special relationship, particularly in support of Ukraine, have been seen as successful. However, Trump’s accusations against the UK and European allies of playing a dangerous game in Greenland have strained the relationship. The UK’s decision to send military personnel to Greenland in solidarity with Denmark and NATO has not appeased Trump, who remains fixated on acquiring Greenland. Despite Starmer’s efforts and discussions with European leaders on Arctic security, Trump remains determined to pursue his goal. In an unusual turn of events, Starmer’s political opponents have supported his stance on Greenland and condemned Trump’s actions. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch also criticized Trump’s approach as «completely wrong.» Starmer pushes back against Trump as president threatens tariffs over Greenland

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

Keir Starmer had hoped to continue his «cost of living tour» this week to address voters’ concerns in this crucial election year. However, Donald Trump’s recent Greenland threat has derailed those plans. Instead, the prime minister and his team have been engaged in discussions with European allies to formulate a response to President Trump’s bold move. The threat to impose additional tariffs on goods from several European countries has significantly escalated tensions between allies regarding Greenland, leaving many shocked and frustrated. «It’s like stepping into an alternate reality,» remarked one official. The uncertainty of whether Trump will back down has added to the anxiety surrounding the situation. Currently, efforts are being made to navigate this delicate situation through diplomatic means. The focus is on understanding the intentions of the US before hastily reacting to every social media announcement. The recent threat by Trump towards Greenland may have been triggered by a misunderstanding. The decision by European NATO members to conduct a reconnaissance mission in Greenland was misinterpreted by the White House as being directed against the US, when in fact it was aimed at Russia and China. Prime Minister Meloni of Italy suggested that there was a communication issue, and that the European initiatives were not meant to be anti-American. Allies have emphasized their commitment to Arctic security as a shared interest, with the Danish exercise Arctic Endurance being a pre-coordinated effort with Allies. The misunderstanding that may have triggered Trump’s latest Greenland threat is the belief that the US wants to work unilaterally on security in the High North, rather than through NATO with European allies. President Trump has expressed a desire to annex Greenland and use it to strengthen US security, despite reassurances from the Danes that the US could expand its security presence on the island. This unilateral approach may be seen as undermining NATO and other international institutions, as Trump also seeks to create a Board of Peace for Gaza with funding requirements for member countries. Trump’s Greenland threat stems from a misunderstanding