• Vie. Ago 1st, 2025

fifebusinessjournal.co.uk

fifebusinessjournal.co.uk

England advances to Women’s Euros final after dramatic win over Italy in extra time

PorStaff

Jul 23, 2025
Chloe Kelly, centre, celebrates with her England teammates after scoring the winning goal of the game. Pic: Reuters

Defending champions England have once again displayed their resilience with a remarkable comeback to secure a 2-1 victory over Italy in extra time during the semi-finals of the Women’s Euros. The Lionesses were on the verge of elimination as they trailed 1-0 with less than a minute remaining in the game at the Stade de Geneve in Switzerland. However, 19-year-old Michelle Agyemang’s last-minute equalizer in the 96th minute forced the game into extra time. England goalkeeper Hannah Hampton’s exceptional double save had kept her team in contention just moments before Agyemang’s crucial goal.

Italy had dominated much of the match following Barbara Bonansea’s 33rd-minute goal, but England regained momentum in extra time as they pushed for a winning goal. The deciding moment came when Beth Mead was fouled in the penalty area in the 116th minute, leading to a penalty for the Lionesses. Despite Chloe Kelly initially having her spot kick saved, she followed up with the rebound to secure the victory.

The drama of this match surpassed even England’s quarter-finals triumph, where they fought back from a 2-0 deficit to equalize and eventually defeat Sweden on penalties, with Agyemang scoring the crucial equalizer in the 81st minute. With this win, England has secured a place in their third consecutive major final and will face the winners of the upcoming semi-final between Spain and Germany at St Jakob-Park in Basel.

Reflecting on past final matches, the Lionesses suffered a 1-0 defeat to Spain in the final of the Women’s World Cup in Sydney in 2023. However, they had previously emerged victorious against Germany in the final of Euro 2022, with Kelly scoring an extra-time winner.

Once again, England’s success was aided by impactful substitutions from the bench. Agyemang and Kelly, who entered the game late, proved to be game-changers in both the semi-final and quarter-final matches. Kelly’s assist for England’s first goal in the semi-final, followed by Agyemang’s subsequent equalizer, showcased the impact of these super-subs.

Looking ahead to the final, England manager Sarina Wiegman faces a selection dilemma as some regular starters have accumulated significant playing time in back-to-back extra-time matches. Agyemang and Kelly have certainly made a strong case for inclusion in the starting lineup for the final showdown. The Lionesses will need to carefully consider their options to ensure they are at their best for the upcoming championship match.

SOURCE

Por Staff

What is the car finance scandal – and what could today’s ruling mean for motorists? The UK’s Supreme Court is poised to deliver a groundbreaking ruling today with potentially billions of pounds at stake for banks and millions of motorists. The crucial issue before the country’s highest court is whether customers should be fully informed about the commission dealers earn on their purchases. However, it’s important to note that the Supreme Court is currently only addressing one of two parallel cases concerning the mis-selling of car finance. Here is a breakdown of both cases and how today’s ruling may impact any future compensation scheme. The first case under consideration by the Supreme Court revolves around complaints regarding the non-disclosure of commission, which affects 99% of car finance cases. Essentially, when individuals purchase a car on finance, they are essentially loaned the money which they then pay off in monthly installments. Brokers, who facilitate the finance plans, earn money through a commission, which is a percentage of the interest payments. Last year, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of three motorists who were unaware that car dealerships they entered finance deals with were receiving a 25% commission, which was added to their bills without their knowledge. The ruling deemed it unlawful for car dealers to receive commissions from lenders without obtaining the customer’s informed consent. However, British lender Close Brothers and South Africa’s FirstRand appealed the decision, leading to the case being escalated to the Supreme Court. The second case, driven by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), involves discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) where brokers and dealers increased interest rates without informing buyers, resulting in higher commissions. This practice was banned by the FCA in 2021, but many consumers have since complained about being overcharged before the ban. The Financial Ombudsman Service has reported handling 20,000 complaints related to this issue. In January 2024, the FCA announced a review into the potential overcharging of motor finance customers due to past use of DCAs. Car finance scandal ruling implications for motorists
Drone incidents in UK prisons increase by over 40%
3-year-old girl found dead in Leeds home, sparking murder investigation

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

What is the car finance scandal – and what could today’s ruling mean for motorists? The UK’s Supreme Court is poised to deliver a groundbreaking ruling today with potentially billions of pounds at stake for banks and millions of motorists. The crucial issue before the country’s highest court is whether customers should be fully informed about the commission dealers earn on their purchases. However, it’s important to note that the Supreme Court is currently only addressing one of two parallel cases concerning the mis-selling of car finance. Here is a breakdown of both cases and how today’s ruling may impact any future compensation scheme. The first case under consideration by the Supreme Court revolves around complaints regarding the non-disclosure of commission, which affects 99% of car finance cases. Essentially, when individuals purchase a car on finance, they are essentially loaned the money which they then pay off in monthly installments. Brokers, who facilitate the finance plans, earn money through a commission, which is a percentage of the interest payments. Last year, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of three motorists who were unaware that car dealerships they entered finance deals with were receiving a 25% commission, which was added to their bills without their knowledge. The ruling deemed it unlawful for car dealers to receive commissions from lenders without obtaining the customer’s informed consent. However, British lender Close Brothers and South Africa’s FirstRand appealed the decision, leading to the case being escalated to the Supreme Court. The second case, driven by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), involves discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) where brokers and dealers increased interest rates without informing buyers, resulting in higher commissions. This practice was banned by the FCA in 2021, but many consumers have since complained about being overcharged before the ban. The Financial Ombudsman Service has reported handling 20,000 complaints related to this issue. In January 2024, the FCA announced a review into the potential overcharging of motor finance customers due to past use of DCAs. Car finance scandal ruling implications for motorists