• Jue. Ene 29th, 2026

Waspi women’s compensation bid rejected once again following government review | Politics News The government has reaffirmed its denial of the plea from women who asserted they were owed billions after the alteration of their state pension age. The Women Against State Pensions Inequality – Waspi – campaign has been campaigning vigorously, alleging that they were not adequately informed about the increase in the state pension age for women from 60 to 65 to align with men. After dismissing this claim in December 2024, the government initiated a review in November of last year to assess new evidence. The Waspi argument revolves around the assertion that the pension age change was implemented too hastily, leaving some women financially unprepared for the years when they could not claim their state pension. In 2024, the government declared that they would not provide compensation as most women were aware of the impending changes, before announcing the review in late 2025. This review focused on a specific claim regarding the communication of the decision. Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden stated in the House of Commons that following the review, «the government has reached the same conclusion on compensation as…announced in December 2024.» He acknowledged the debate surrounding the increase in the state pension age and the decision made in 2011 to accelerate equalisation. However, Mr. McFadden clarified that the review was specifically about how the changes to the state pension age were communicated, not the policy decision-making process. He admitted that individual letters regarding the changes could have been sent earlier and expressed regret on behalf of the government for the delay in sending those letters. Campaigners are contemplating legal action in response to the government’s decision. Angela Madden, the chair of Waspi, criticized the government’s choice as a «disgraceful political decision» and highlighted the injustice faced by millions of women. She mentioned that Waspi is seeking legal advice, keeping all options open.

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

Ene 29, 2026
Waspi women protesting. Pic: PA

The government has reiterated its stance on rejecting the claims made by women in the Women Against State Pensions Inequality (Waspi) campaign, who argued that they were owed billions due to changes in their state pension age.

The campaign, which has been lobbying extensively, contended that women were not adequately informed about the increase in the state pension age from 60 to 65 to align with men.

Despite dismissing this claim in December 2024, the government announced a review in November of last year to consider new evidence.

The crux of the Waspi argument revolves around the assertion that the pension age change was implemented too swiftly, leaving many women financially unprepared for the years when they could not claim their state pension.

In 2024, the government stated that women would not be compensated as most were aware of the impending changes. However, they later initiated a review in late 2025 specifically addressing how the decision was communicated.

During a session in the House of Commons, Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden reaffirmed the government’s decision on compensation and acknowledged the debate on the wisdom of accelerating the equalisation of pension ages to 66 in 2011.

McFadden clarified that the review focused on communication of the pension age changes rather than the policy decision-making process.

He admitted that the government could have sent out letters about the changes sooner and apologized for the delay.

Additionally, he concurred with the Parliamentary and Health Service ombudsman’s findings that the delay did not cause any direct financial harm to women.

Image:
Pat McFadden spoke in the Commons. Pic: Parliament

Read more:
Workers being ‘hammered’ while pensioners benefit
Three major pension reforms happening in 2026

Campaigners considering legal action

Angela Madden, the chair of Waspi, criticized the government’s decision, stating, «This is a disgraceful political choice by a small group of very powerful people who have decided the harm and injustice suffered by millions of ordinary women simply does not matter.»

She added, «WASPI is taking legal advice, and all options remain on the table.» «We are prepared to explore all avenues in Parliament and in the courts to achieve the justice that has been unjustly withheld.»

Approximately 3.6 million women were impacted by the changes to the state pension age.

The government has estimated that compensating these women could cost £10.5 billion.

Women born between April 1951 and 1960 were affected by the changes.

The government has reiterated its stance on the Women Against State Pensions Inequality (Waspi) campaign, which has been advocating for compensation for women affected by changes to the state pension age. The campaign argues that women were not adequately informed about the changes that raised the pension age for women from 60 to 65, aligning it with that of men.

Despite initially rejecting the claim for compensation in December 2024, the government announced a review in November of the same year to consider new evidence presented by the campaign. The review specifically focused on how the decision to change the state pension age was communicated to the affected women.

In the House of Commons, Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden reaffirmed the government’s decision not to compensate the women affected by the change in the pension age. He stated that the review had led to the same conclusion as the government’s previous stance in 2024. While acknowledging that there were concerns about the speed at which the changes were implemented, McFadden emphasized that the review was centered on the communication of the policy, not its decision-making process.

McFadden also acknowledged that there were delays in sending out individual letters about the changes to the state pension age, expressing apologies on behalf of the government for the oversight. However, he clarified that the delayed communication did not result in direct financial losses for the affected women, as determined by the Parliamentary and Health Service ombudsman.

The Waspi campaign has been advocating for around 3.6 million women born between April 1951 and 1960 who were impacted by the change in the state pension age. The government had estimated that compensating these women could cost £10.5 billion, but has not committed to providing compensation at this time.

The changes to the state pension age were initially announced in the 1995 Pensions Act, with a target to equalize male and female pensions by 2020. This deadline was later accelerated to 2018, with the pension age raised to 66 in 2011.

Despite the ongoing efforts of the Waspi campaign to seek justice and compensation for the affected women, the government has maintained its position on the matter, emphasizing the need for clarity and understanding in communicating such significant policy changes.

SOURCE

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

Waspi women’s compensation bid rejected once again following government review | Politics News The government has reaffirmed its denial of the plea from women who asserted they were owed billions after the alteration of their state pension age. The Women Against State Pensions Inequality – Waspi – campaign has been campaigning vigorously, alleging that they were not adequately informed about the increase in the state pension age for women from 60 to 65 to align with men. After dismissing this claim in December 2024, the government initiated a review in November of last year to assess new evidence. The Waspi argument revolves around the assertion that the pension age change was implemented too hastily, leaving some women financially unprepared for the years when they could not claim their state pension. In 2024, the government declared that they would not provide compensation as most women were aware of the impending changes, before announcing the review in late 2025. This review focused on a specific claim regarding the communication of the decision. Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden stated in the House of Commons that following the review, «the government has reached the same conclusion on compensation as…announced in December 2024.» He acknowledged the debate surrounding the increase in the state pension age and the decision made in 2011 to accelerate equalisation. However, Mr. McFadden clarified that the review was specifically about how the changes to the state pension age were communicated, not the policy decision-making process. He admitted that individual letters regarding the changes could have been sent earlier and expressed regret on behalf of the government for the delay in sending those letters. Campaigners are contemplating legal action in response to the government’s decision. Angela Madden, the chair of Waspi, criticized the government’s choice as a «disgraceful political decision» and highlighted the injustice faced by millions of women. She mentioned that Waspi is seeking legal advice, keeping all options open.