• Jue. Ene 29th, 2026

Victims of Infected Blood Scandal Fear Missing Compensation

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

May 5, 2025
File pic: PA

Individuals who received infected blood while under NHS care are expressing concerns that they may not live to see any compensation, as reported by campaigners.

The Infected Blood Inquiry is scheduled to resume later this week to assess the government’s response to compensation in terms of timeliness and adequacy.

One individual, Gary Webster, who contracted HIV and hepatitis C during his time at Lord Mayor’s Treloar’s School in Hampshire in the 1970s and 1980s, mentioned that things have taken a turn for the worse since the publication of the inquiry’s report in May last year.

Webster expressed his frustration with the slow progress and the seemingly arbitrary selection process for compensation recipients. He emphasized the urgency of the situation, noting that the current timeline for compensation payouts leaves many infected individuals without closure.

He added, «I think people are scared now that they’re not going to survive until they get compensation.»

More on Infected Blood Inquiry

Another former student of the school, Glenn Wilkinson, who was infected with hepatitis C, criticized the compensation offer as «paltry» when speaking to Sky News last year.

The Haemophilia Society highlighted the devastating impact the scandal has had on individuals’ lives, with delays in compensation only adding to their suffering.

The Hepatitis C Trust expressed hope that the reopening of the inquiry would lead to a significant shift in the government’s approach to those affected by this tragic situation.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Infected blood claim delays

Between the 1970s and early 1990s, over 30,000 individuals in the UK were infected with HIV and hepatitis C while under NHS care.

Tragically, more than 3,000 people have lost their lives due to receiving contaminated blood and blood products, leaving survivors with lifelong consequences.

‘Restless for progress’

In the Budget last October, Chancellor Rachel Reeves pledged £11.8 billion to compensate victims of the infected blood scandal.

The compensation scheme is overseen by the Infected Blood Compensation Authority (IBCA), which, as of 24 April, has invited 475 individuals to file claims and has made 77 payments totaling over £78 million, according to official data.

Campaigners will present evidence during the upcoming hearings of the inquiry, along with Cabinet Office minister Nick Thomas-Symonds, who expressed a sense of urgency in distributing compensation.

Sir Brian Langstaff, the chairman of the inquiry, emphasized the distress and powerlessness felt by victims and their families due to the government’s approach, stressing that time is not on the side of those affected.

Read more from Sky News:
When and where to watch VE Day flypast route
Meghan posts new photo of Prince Harry after backlash

An IBCA spokesperson stated that their primary focus is on expediting payments to as many individuals as possible and leveraging their learnings to increase the number of claims processed each week.

A government spokesperson affirmed the commitment to collaborating with the inquiry and striving to deliver one of the most comprehensive compensation schemes in modern history.

SOURCE

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

Waspi women’s compensation bid rejected once again following government review | Politics News The government has reaffirmed its denial of the plea from women who asserted they were owed billions after the alteration of their state pension age. The Women Against State Pensions Inequality – Waspi – campaign has been campaigning vigorously, alleging that they were not adequately informed about the increase in the state pension age for women from 60 to 65 to align with men. After dismissing this claim in December 2024, the government initiated a review in November of last year to assess new evidence. The Waspi argument revolves around the assertion that the pension age change was implemented too hastily, leaving some women financially unprepared for the years when they could not claim their state pension. In 2024, the government declared that they would not provide compensation as most women were aware of the impending changes, before announcing the review in late 2025. This review focused on a specific claim regarding the communication of the decision. Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden stated in the House of Commons that following the review, «the government has reached the same conclusion on compensation as…announced in December 2024.» He acknowledged the debate surrounding the increase in the state pension age and the decision made in 2011 to accelerate equalisation. However, Mr. McFadden clarified that the review was specifically about how the changes to the state pension age were communicated, not the policy decision-making process. He admitted that individual letters regarding the changes could have been sent earlier and expressed regret on behalf of the government for the delay in sending those letters. Campaigners are contemplating legal action in response to the government’s decision. Angela Madden, the chair of Waspi, criticized the government’s choice as a «disgraceful political decision» and highlighted the injustice faced by millions of women. She mentioned that Waspi is seeking legal advice, keeping all options open.