• Dom. Feb 15th, 2026

UK government borrowing and spending challenges prompt tax rise or spending cut pressure

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

Mar 21, 2025

Government spending and borrowing have defied expectations, leading to «perilous» public finances and increasing pressure on the chancellor to consider raising taxes or cutting spending. In the latest official figures, government borrowing last month exceeded expectations by £15 billion compared to the previous year, resulting in a higher deficit than economists had predicted.

The Office for National Statistics reported that in February, the gap between government revenue and spending was £10.7 billion, with spending surpassing forecasts and tax revenue falling short. This amount marks the fourth-highest deficit since records began in 1993, exceeding economist predictions by £4.1 billion.

Independent forecasters, such as the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), have noted that tax revenues have been lower than anticipated. Tax receipts are currently £11.4 billion below the OBR forecast for the financial year, while borrowing is £20.4 billion higher than expected.

Compared to last year, government borrowing has increased significantly, with the ONS data showing a rise from £117.5 billion to £132.2 billion, representing a £15 billion increase. This news comes just before Chancellor Rachel Reeves is set to provide an update on the state of the British economy in her upcoming spring statement.

The recent revision of the surplus reported last month, down by £2.1 billion, has further exacerbated the financial challenges. Respected think tank, the Resolution Foundation, has described the public finances as being in a «perilous» state, indicating the need for potential spending cuts and tax increases.

Analysts from Pantheon Macro suggest that cuts will be announced during the spring statement next week, while tax rises are expected to be introduced in the October budget. The Resolution Foundation warned that if the economy does not show signs of improvement soon, tax increases may become necessary.

In response to the concerning figures, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones emphasized the government’s commitment to scrutinizing every taxpayer penny meticulously to ensure sound public finances. He stressed the importance of adhering to fiscal rules and stated that the government will prioritize securing Britain’s future without compromising the integrity of public finances.

SOURCE

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Trial date set for Trump’s $10bn lawsuit against BBC over Panorama edit scheduled for February in Miami.
Are the recent AI resignations a sign of impending danger for the world? | Updates on Science, Climate & Technology News Are the recent AI resignations indicating a global crisis? | Science, Climate & Tech News Even though they exit without much fanfare, their departure is often viewed as a significant sign. This week has seen several high-profile resignations. Mrinank Sharma, a researcher at Anthropic, a leading AI company, posted a resignation statement on social media on Tuesday, warning that «the world is in peril.» While Sharma did not explicitly state the reason for the world being in danger, he mentioned that the threat was not just from AI or bioweapons but from a combination of ongoing interconnected crises. This led many to believe that the existential risk posed by AI is on the rise. Zoe Hitzig, a researcher at OpenAI, also resigned this week, expressing «deep reservations» about OpenAI’s decision to introduce advertising to ChatGPT in an essay for the New York Times. She cautioned that ChatGPT could potentially manipulate individuals if their data was not adequately safeguarded. Additionally, two co-founders of xAI left their positions this week, along with several other staff members at Elon Musk’s AI company. xAI, known for its Grok chatbot, faced backlash for allowing the generation of nonconsensual sexualized images before taking corrective action. Although these departures have been viewed as a significant event, upon closer examination, they seem to have little in common.
Bank CEOs’ Pay Rises Alongside Profits at Lloyds, Barclays, and NatWest

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

Are the recent AI resignations a sign of impending danger for the world? | Updates on Science, Climate & Technology News Are the recent AI resignations indicating a global crisis? | Science, Climate & Tech News Even though they exit without much fanfare, their departure is often viewed as a significant sign. This week has seen several high-profile resignations. Mrinank Sharma, a researcher at Anthropic, a leading AI company, posted a resignation statement on social media on Tuesday, warning that «the world is in peril.» While Sharma did not explicitly state the reason for the world being in danger, he mentioned that the threat was not just from AI or bioweapons but from a combination of ongoing interconnected crises. This led many to believe that the existential risk posed by AI is on the rise. Zoe Hitzig, a researcher at OpenAI, also resigned this week, expressing «deep reservations» about OpenAI’s decision to introduce advertising to ChatGPT in an essay for the New York Times. She cautioned that ChatGPT could potentially manipulate individuals if their data was not adequately safeguarded. Additionally, two co-founders of xAI left their positions this week, along with several other staff members at Elon Musk’s AI company. xAI, known for its Grok chatbot, faced backlash for allowing the generation of nonconsensual sexualized images before taking corrective action. Although these departures have been viewed as a significant event, upon closer examination, they seem to have little in common.