Manchester United distanced themselves from Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s controversial remarks on immigration after 23 hours. In a statement without directly naming the part-owner, the club emphasized their unwavering commitment to «equality, diversity, and inclusion,» serving as a public rebuke.
Sir Jim, who owns just under 30% of the club, has been increasingly vocal about immigration issues despite the Glazer siblings, the majority owners, having immigrant roots. The club’s statement, while not directly addressing Sir Jim’s remarks about immigration colonization, emphasized Manchester’s inclusivity as a city that welcomes all.
Sir Jim issued an apology that lacked any mention of diversity and inclusion, instead focusing more on defending his choice of language. This has raised concerns among various parties, including Reform, Labour, and the Conservatives, about the inflammatory nature of his comments demonizing immigrants.
The fallout from Sir Jim’s remarks has extended to potential legal repercussions from the Football Association for bringing the game into disrepute. Despite the controversy, Sir Jim has been adamant about his concerns regarding immigration levels, even tying it back to his role in football operations at Manchester United.
The language used by Sir Jim has drawn criticism from Piara Powar, executive director of the FARE network, who warned about the risks of escalating hate. His comments have also sparked concerns among fans, particularly those from diverse communities, who may feel discriminated against at matches.
Asif Mahmud, chair of the Manchester United Muslim Supporters’ Club, expressed concerns about the empowerment of those threatening minority communities due to comments like Sir Jim’s. Similarly, Preetam Singh from the Stretford Sikhs fans’ group called for a more genuine apology from Sir Jim to address the impact of his words.
The ongoing fallout from Sir Jim’s remarks has implications beyond just reputational damage for Manchester United. It raises questions about the inclusivity of the club and how players, staff, and fans from diverse backgrounds feel welcomed in light of such controversial statements.
SOURCE