• Vie. Abr 3rd, 2026

Ofwat could be replaced in water industry reforms

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

Jul 18, 2025

An independent review of the water industry is set to propose extensive changes to the sector’s management, including the potential replacement of Ofwat with a strengthened body that integrates economic and environmental regulation.

Former Bank of England governor Sir Jon Cunliffe will release the results of the Independent Water Commission on Monday, with industry stakeholders anticipating significant regulatory reforms.

In recent years, the current regulator Ofwat has faced criticism from all quarters due to increasing public dissatisfaction with pollution levels and the financial practices of water companies.

Read more:
Serious water pollution incidents in England up 60% last year

Why has there been a surge in water pollution?

Campaigners and politicians have accused Ofwat of failing to hold water operators accountable, while companies argue that its emphasis on cost control has hindered necessary infrastructure investments.

In a preliminary report issued in June, Sir Jon highlighted the challenges posed by multiple regulators with overlapping responsibilities as a key issue confronting the industry.

While Ofwat serves as the economic regulator, the Environment Agency oversees pollution standards in conjunction with the Drinking Water Inspectorate.

Sir Jon’s final report is expected to suggest that the government explore the establishment of a new regulator that consolidates Ofwat’s economic regulatory authority with the water-related responsibilities currently overseen by the Environment Agency.

In his interim report, Sir Jon mentioned various reform options ranging from streamlining existing regulations to more comprehensive structural changes integrating regulatory mandates and functions.

As he finalizes his report, Sir Jon is believed to have engaged in discussions with industry and government leaders on the implications of fundamental reform.

Following the report’s release, Environment Secretary Steve Reed is anticipated to initiate a consultation on the recommendations put forth by the commission.

The commission is also likely to propose a «significant shift» in the economic regulation model, transitioning from econometric modeling to a supervisory approach that considers individual company circumstances to a greater extent.

Read more from Sky News:
Police taking no further action over Kneecap’s Glastonbury show
New fee for Britons traveling to EU will cost more than expected

How water can teach Labour a much-needed lesson

Liz Bates

Political correspondent

@wizbates

On Monday, the government’s long-awaited review into the UK’s water industry will finally report.

The expectation is that it will recommend sweeping changes – including the abolition of the regulator, Ofwat.

But frustrated customers of the water companies could rightly complain that the process of taking on this failing sector and its regulator has been slow and ineffective.

They may be forgiven for going further and suggesting that how Labour has dealt with water is symbolic of their inability to make an impact across many areas of public life, leaving many of their voters disappointed.

This is an industry that has been visibly and rapidly declining for decades, with the illegal sewage dumping and rotting pipes in stark contrast with the vast salaries and bonuses paid out to their executives.

It doesn’t take a review to see what’s gone wrong. Most informed members of the public could explain what has happened in a matter of minutes.

And yet, despite 14 years in opposition with plenty of time to put together a radical plan, a review is exactly what the government decided on before taking on Ofwat.

Month after month, they were asked if they believed the water industry regulator was fit for purpose despite the obvious disintegration on their watch. Every time the answer was ‘yes’.

As in so many areas of government, Labour, instead of acting, needed someone else to make the decision for them, meaning that it has taken over a year to come to the simple conclusion that the regulator is in fact, not fit for purpose.

As they enter their second year in office, maybe this can provide a lesson they desperately need to learn if they want to turn around their fortunes.

That bold decisions do not require months of review, endless consultations, or outside experts to endlessly analyze the problem.

They just need to get on with it. Voters will thank them.

Sir Jon has emphasized the need for long-term strategic planning and stability in the water industry to attract «low-risk, low-return investors.»

The industry has long voiced concerns about the current model, where companies are compared against an idealized model operator and penalized for failing to meet financial and environmental standards, posing a potential «doom loop.»

Thames Water, currently grappling with an equity process to avoid special administration, has attributed its financial distress in part to significant fines for failing pollution standards.

The release of the Independent Commission report coincides with the Environment Agency’s publication of data indicating a 60% increase in serious pollution incidents in 2024, as Thames Water enforces a hosepipe ban on 15 million customers.

Ofwat, Water UK, and the Department for the Environment have all opted not to provide comments.

SOURCE

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *