• Dom. Feb 15th, 2026

Heathrow shutdown: Closure could cost millions in economic losses

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

Mar 22, 2025

The closure of Heathrow Airport could cost millions of pounds, with travellers and goods grounded as Europe’s largest airport spent the vast majority of Friday without power.

As well as airlines being impacted by diversions and associated compensation, the UK economy will be affected by the absence of cargo, tourists and business travellers landing for a day.

In the early hours of Friday morning Heathrow announced it would be closed for the rest of the day with no flights landing or taking off due to a «significant» power outage caused by a fire at an electricity substation. The cause of the fire is not yet known.

Heathrow closure latest: Counter-terrorism police leading investigation

Every year Heathrow handles nearly £200bn worth of cargo which breaks down to goods priced at £543m travelling through every day, according to the airport.

Top exports from the airport are salmon, books and medicine, while items most commonly imported through the hub are vegetables, flowers and compounds found in medicine, plastics and perfume.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Heathrow: What can passengers do?

Nearly half (48%) of all UK air cargo was processed through Heathrow in 2023, meaning around 0.13% of the UK’s annual cargo was due to be handled today.

The broader economy cost

Researchers at the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) calculated the economic impacts of the airport and estimated in 2021 the value of trade it contributed would reach £204bn by 2025.

Money blog: Trustpilot ‘can’t be trusted’ say small businesses

It would contribute £4.7bn to the economy, it forecast, meaning a daily contribution of £12.88m, a figure that could be lost by the airport’s shutdown.

The financial loss could be in the region of hundreds of millions of pounds, according to the founder of Endau Analytics, an aviation industry advisory firm.

A hit to airlines

Airlines and suppliers alone could have costs of «at least» £20m for a day of halted operations, according to travel expert Paul Charles, a former Virgin Atlantic communications director and chief executive of travel consultancy The PC Agency.

The figure is so high as it includes an estimate of expenses for passengers, crew accommodation, additional transport, fuel and other costs for the aircraft themselves.

Analysts at investment bank Jefferies said compensation for delays could knock 1% to 3% off profits at BA and Aer Lingus parent company IAG.

However, the head of the Spanish airlines association Javier Gandara said the outage was likely considered a force majeure event, meaning passengers would not be entitled to compensation.

In a force majeure situation, airlines have to assist passengers by providing accommodation and meals but don’t have to pay compensation.

Aside from the costs of dealing with the closure the company values have dropped as share prices fell.

IAG, which also owns airlines Vueling and Iberia, saw its share price fall 2.34% as of 3pm on Friday, wiping £326m off the company value.

Similarly, EasyJet shed £33.5m with a 0.9% stock fall and Wizz Air lost £38.37m after a £2.18% drop in share price.

SOURCE

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Trial date set for Trump’s $10bn lawsuit against BBC over Panorama edit scheduled for February in Miami.
Are the recent AI resignations a sign of impending danger for the world? | Updates on Science, Climate & Technology News Are the recent AI resignations indicating a global crisis? | Science, Climate & Tech News Even though they exit without much fanfare, their departure is often viewed as a significant sign. This week has seen several high-profile resignations. Mrinank Sharma, a researcher at Anthropic, a leading AI company, posted a resignation statement on social media on Tuesday, warning that «the world is in peril.» While Sharma did not explicitly state the reason for the world being in danger, he mentioned that the threat was not just from AI or bioweapons but from a combination of ongoing interconnected crises. This led many to believe that the existential risk posed by AI is on the rise. Zoe Hitzig, a researcher at OpenAI, also resigned this week, expressing «deep reservations» about OpenAI’s decision to introduce advertising to ChatGPT in an essay for the New York Times. She cautioned that ChatGPT could potentially manipulate individuals if their data was not adequately safeguarded. Additionally, two co-founders of xAI left their positions this week, along with several other staff members at Elon Musk’s AI company. xAI, known for its Grok chatbot, faced backlash for allowing the generation of nonconsensual sexualized images before taking corrective action. Although these departures have been viewed as a significant event, upon closer examination, they seem to have little in common.
Bank CEOs’ Pay Rises Alongside Profits at Lloyds, Barclays, and NatWest

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

Are the recent AI resignations a sign of impending danger for the world? | Updates on Science, Climate & Technology News Are the recent AI resignations indicating a global crisis? | Science, Climate & Tech News Even though they exit without much fanfare, their departure is often viewed as a significant sign. This week has seen several high-profile resignations. Mrinank Sharma, a researcher at Anthropic, a leading AI company, posted a resignation statement on social media on Tuesday, warning that «the world is in peril.» While Sharma did not explicitly state the reason for the world being in danger, he mentioned that the threat was not just from AI or bioweapons but from a combination of ongoing interconnected crises. This led many to believe that the existential risk posed by AI is on the rise. Zoe Hitzig, a researcher at OpenAI, also resigned this week, expressing «deep reservations» about OpenAI’s decision to introduce advertising to ChatGPT in an essay for the New York Times. She cautioned that ChatGPT could potentially manipulate individuals if their data was not adequately safeguarded. Additionally, two co-founders of xAI left their positions this week, along with several other staff members at Elon Musk’s AI company. xAI, known for its Grok chatbot, faced backlash for allowing the generation of nonconsensual sexualized images before taking corrective action. Although these departures have been viewed as a significant event, upon closer examination, they seem to have little in common.