• Jue. Ene 29th, 2026

Cabinet minister calls for Lord Mandelson to apologize over Jeffrey Epstein friendship

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

Ene 11, 2026

A cabinet minister has said anyone associated with Jeffrey Epstein should "apologise" to his victims after Lord Mandelson declined to do so. The former US ambassador refused to apologise for his personal relationship with Jeffrey Epstein when interviewed by the BBC this morning.

Politics latest: Minister ‘very concerned’ by violence in Iran amid ‘repressive regime’
Asked by Sky News’ political reporter Ben Bloch whether Lord Mandelson should have apologised, Business Secretary Peter Kyle said: "I saw some of the interview this morning. "I think everyone associated with Epstein should be apologising for the lapse of judgement that led to any kind of relationship with that man."

Lord Mandelson, who was sacked last September over emails which showed the extent of his support for the convicted paedophile following his conviction, told BBC One’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg he had paid a "calamitous" price for their association. But he told BBC One’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg that he "never saw anything in his life when I was with him, when I was in his homes, that would give me any reason to suspect what this evil monster was doing in preying on these young women. "I think the issue is that because I was a gay man in his circle, I was kept separate from what he was doing in the sexual side of his life."

Asked whether he wanted to apologise to Epstein’s victims, Lord Mandelson said he wanted to apologise for a "system that refused to hear their voices and did not give them the protection they were entitled to expect." But pressed on whether he would apologise for his personal actions, Lord Mandelson said: "If I had known, if I was in any way complicit or culpable, of course I would apologise… but I was not culpable, I was not knowledgeable for what he was doing, and I regret, and will regret to my dying day, the fact that powerless women were not given the protection they were entitled to expect." "I saw some of the interview this morning. I think everyone associated with Epstein (should be) apologising for the lapse of judgement that led to any kind of relationship with that man."

In 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution and soliciting a minor but Lord Mandelson said he believed his excuses and continued to support him.

Read more:
What do we know about Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein?
Asylum hotel migrant evictions set to begin in the spring

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander told the programme: "I think what we saw there in that interview was, at best, deep naivety from Peter Mandelson. "And I think it would have gone a long way for the women who were subjected to the most appalling treatment at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein for Peter to have apologised and taken that opportunity."

Epstein was found dead in his cell at a federal jail in Manhattan, New York, in August 2019 while he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges. His death was ruled a suicide.

SOURCE

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

Waspi women’s compensation bid rejected once again following government review | Politics News The government has reaffirmed its denial of the plea from women who asserted they were owed billions after the alteration of their state pension age. The Women Against State Pensions Inequality – Waspi – campaign has been campaigning vigorously, alleging that they were not adequately informed about the increase in the state pension age for women from 60 to 65 to align with men. After dismissing this claim in December 2024, the government initiated a review in November of last year to assess new evidence. The Waspi argument revolves around the assertion that the pension age change was implemented too hastily, leaving some women financially unprepared for the years when they could not claim their state pension. In 2024, the government declared that they would not provide compensation as most women were aware of the impending changes, before announcing the review in late 2025. This review focused on a specific claim regarding the communication of the decision. Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden stated in the House of Commons that following the review, «the government has reached the same conclusion on compensation as…announced in December 2024.» He acknowledged the debate surrounding the increase in the state pension age and the decision made in 2011 to accelerate equalisation. However, Mr. McFadden clarified that the review was specifically about how the changes to the state pension age were communicated, not the policy decision-making process. He admitted that individual letters regarding the changes could have been sent earlier and expressed regret on behalf of the government for the delay in sending those letters. Campaigners are contemplating legal action in response to the government’s decision. Angela Madden, the chair of Waspi, criticized the government’s choice as a «disgraceful political decision» and highlighted the injustice faced by millions of women. She mentioned that Waspi is seeking legal advice, keeping all options open.