• Dom. Mar 29th, 2026

Tesla charging stations set on fire in Massachusetts amid backlash against Elon Musk

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

Mar 6, 2025
The burning Tesla chargers. Pic: Littleton Fire Department

Tesla charging stations have been set on fire in the US state of Massachusetts as a backlash against Elon Musk grows. Demonstrators have been protesting against his close ties to Donald Trump and embrace of far-right politicians around the world. Officers and firefighters rushed to The Point Shopping Center near Boston and found the charging stations «engulfed in flames and heavy, dark smoke».

Police said seven charging stations were damaged and the «fire appears to have been intentionally set», but no injuries were reported. Musk, the billionaire chief executive of Tesla, now heads up the president’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Mr Musk has overseen the firing of thousands of government employees in recent weeks. The world’s richest man and his companies have been targeted since he made what looked like a Nazi salute at Mr Trump’s inauguration, with analysts saying Tesla’s car sales have fallen.

Tesla cars have been vandalised – and a woman was arrested after being accused of trying to burn down a Tesla dealership in Colorado. Some owners have put stickers on their cars announcing: «I bought it before Elon went nuts».

Mr Musk has also faced a backlash in Europe, where he has urged supporters of a German far-right party to move beyond their «past guilt», called for the release of jailed far-right activist Tommy Robinson, and described Sir Keir Starmer as an «evil tyrant». Read more from Sky News: China says it is ‘ready for any type of war’ with US after tariffs Billions of pounds in spending cuts expected in spring statement Bangladesh’s ousted PM ‘to stand trial’

A suspected arson attack caused a power outage and led to production being halted at a Tesla plant in the German state of Brandenburg, while an image of Musk making a straight-armed salute was also projected on a Tesla factory outside Berlin. In London, a poster at a bus stop featured a similar image and branded Teslas as «the swasticar».

Musk’s political activism impacting sales
Tesla saw its European sales figures drop by 45% in January, according to research firm Jato Dynamics, with sales in Germany and France down by about 60%. Senior analyst Felipe Munoz told Sky News «it’s hard to tell exactly how much his activism is impacting sales» – but said it was clear his «active role in politics» was «having an impact» on the company. Some of the decline may be linked to prospective buyers holding off buying the latest version of Tesla’s bestseller, the Model Y, with a new version due to be released later this year. But Mr Munoz said sales of the Model 3 had seen a «worrying» drop despite there being no reason for buyers to wait.

Democrats protest in Congress with ‘Musk steals’ signs
In a lengthy address to Congress on Tuesday, Mr Trump praised Mr Musk’s work, prompting two standing ovations from Republicans in the chamber. The president made exaggerated claims about alleged government abuse Mr Musk and his team had uncovered – prompting Democrats to wave signs reading «false» and «Musk steals».

Since Mr Trump’s inauguration, Tesla’s stock has fallen by 37% – representing a loss of $550bn (£429bn). Mr Munoz, said the long-term impact of the anger with Mr Musk may be easier to see in a few months. He added: «Most of the drivers care about the car, they don’t care about what the manager or owner of the company thinks, as long as their car doesn’t break.»

SOURCE

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

For months, the UK has been moving towards banning under-16s from social media. Inspired by Australia’s ban, campaigners and MPs have brought the idea of a teenage ban into the UK’s mainstream, and now the government is consulting the public on what it thinks should happen. Among adults, it’s a popular idea; a YouGov poll found that nearly three-quarters of UK adults want to ban under-16s from social media. It’s easy to understand why; we’ve reported on numerous horror stories of parents finding their children dead in bedrooms after being exposed to harmful content. We’ve covered sextortion, child sexual abuse, blackmail, and more, all happening on social media platforms. It’s reached the point where people impacted by these nightmare circumstances have had enough; if these companies can’t be trusted to look after our children, they say, we need to take them off the platforms. But this isn’t a clear-cut case. There are many people concerned about the impact of social media on children who argue that a ban isn’t the right solution. Take Professor Sander van der Linden, a Cambridge psychology researcher who has studied the impact of social media for years. He said there is «zero empirical evidence» to support a ban, and recently wrote a piece in the science journal Nature arguing against it. «Blindly instituting wholesale bans for teens takes the ‘evidence’ out of evidence-based policy,» he argued. But he isn’t saying that things should just stay the same. In fact, he wants children as young as four to begin digital literacy education to protect them in the future and, crucially, wants social media companies to be held more responsible for building safe platforms in the first place. Girl Guides, protesters, the chief executive of the NSPCC – they all believed that social media companies should be forced to change their platforms rather than young people being forced to come off them. «These issues don’t [just] affect teenagers,» 15-year-old Imogen said. She’s a Girl Guiding advocate, one of three speaking after a Girl Guiding poll suggested just 15% of teenagers support a ban. «Someone in their 30s isn’t going to want to see the violent content that teenagers are seeing, so it’s not solving the issue.» «If we put a ban [in place], then that’s just saying we’re the problem,» said 16-year-old Freya. «It’s our fault when actually it’s their algorithms, it’s the way that they’ve made their platforms.» One protester, Hannah from Mad Youth Organise, told us her group wants companies to pay a 4% «misery tax» to fund mental health services and mitigate the damage they say the companies have caused. But the other argument against a ban isn’t about changing how the companies work, it’s about the impact on young people themselves. Prof van der Linden said the impact of social media varies between different groups of young people. Social media impact on mental health: A nuanced debate