• Sáb. Ene 31st, 2026

Post Office to challenge first Capture case at Court of Appeal

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

Ene 31, 2026

The Post Office will challenge the first ever Capture case at the Court of Appeal, according to Sky News sources.

Former sub-postmistress Pat Owen, who passed away in 2003, was convicted of theft in 1998 based on evidence from the flawed Capture computer system.

Her case was referred to the Court of Appeal as a potential miscarriage of justice last year, and the Post Office has now decided to oppose it.

A spokesperson stated that «the case needs to be fully reviewed by the Court of Appeal.»

Capture, accounting software implemented in up to 2,500 branches in the 1990s, was utilized just before the infamous Horizon system was introduced – which led to hundreds of wrongful convictions.

Image:
Mr Marston shows a disc with the faulty computer software called Capture

A government-commissioned report in 2024 determined that the Capture software likely caused accounting errors.

Mrs. Owen’s Court of Appeal case had already been postponed in December after the Post Office requested an extension to respond to documents presented by her defense team.

More on Post Office Scandal

A new deadline of 30 January was established, and just before it expired, Mrs. Owen’s family was informed that her case would be contested.

The family, who have waited nearly three decades to appeal the case, have informed Sky News that they will not provide comments until they receive legal advice.

The Post Office has said it wants all unsafe convictions overturned. Pic: iStock

Image:
The Post Office has said it wants all unsafe convictions overturned.

Former sub-postmaster Steve Marston, a Capture user who was also convicted of stealing in 1998, expressed his frustration with the Post Office’s handling of postmasters whose lives were ruined by the faulty software.

He highlighted the overwhelming evidence of the Post Office’s knowledge of the software’s flaws and their continued intimidation and prosecution of postmasters.

Marston, a prominent advocate for Capture victims, criticized the Post Office for not supporting Mrs. Owen’s case and delaying justice for the victims.

In response, a Post Office spokesperson stated that this was the first Capture case referred to the Court of Appeal by the CCRC and emphasized their commitment to overturning unsafe convictions swiftly and in accordance with the law.

They assured full cooperation with the CCRC and the Court of Appeal in reviewing cases involving Capture evidence and expressed openness to new evidence that may warrant a change in their position.

The spokesperson also mentioned the government redress scheme for Capture victims who were not convicted, which was launched last year.

Read more from Sky News:
Epstein sent thousands to Mandelson’s husband
High hopes for Team GB at Winter Olympics

Last year, Sky News uncovered a report from 1998 revealing the faults in the Capture software, which may not have been presented to the jury in Mrs. Owen’s case.

Furthermore, a government report in 2024 confirmed the software’s role in accounting errors, further supporting the case for a miscarriage of justice in Mrs. Owen’s conviction.


Former sub-postmaster Steve Marston, a Capture user who was also convicted of stealing in 1998, expressed his frustration with the Post Office’s handling of postmasters whose lives were «destroyed» by the faulty software.

He highlighted the «overwhelming evidence» that the Post Office continued to intimidate and prosecute postmasters despite knowing that the Capture software was not fit for purpose.

As a leading campaigner for Capture victims, Mr. Marston criticized the Post Office for not supporting Mrs. Owen’s case and failing to deliver justice to victims in a timely manner.

In response to the case being referred to the Court of Appeal, a Post Office spokesperson stated their commitment to overturning unsafe convictions and cooperating with the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) in considering appeals swiftly and fairly.

They emphasized their duty to the appellant, Mrs. Owen’s family, and the Court, and assured full cooperation with the CCRC and submission of all necessary documents and information for the case.

The spokesperson also mentioned the possibility of reviewing their position if new evidence is presented and expressed willingness to assist with future Capture cases based on guidance from the Court.

Sky News uncovered an expert report from 1998 revealing the faults in the Capture software, which may not have been disclosed to the jury in Mrs. Owen’s case. Additionally, a redress scheme for Capture victims who were not convicted was launched last year by the government.

The Post Office’s decision to oppose Mrs. Owen’s Court of Appeal case, based on evidence from the faulty Capture system, comes after a government report in 2024 confirmed that the software likely caused accounting errors.

The case had already faced delays in December due to the Post Office requesting an extension to respond to the defence team’s submissions. A new deadline was set for January 30, and shortly before it expired, Mrs. Owen’s family was informed of the Post Office’s decision to oppose the case.

The family, who have been waiting for nearly thirty years to appeal the conviction, refrained from commenting pending legal advice.

The Post Office has expressed its commitment to overturning all unsafe convictions and ensuring a fair and thorough consideration of the Capture case at the Court of Appeal.

SOURCE

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *