• Lun. Ene 19th, 2026

Starmer leads first cabinet meeting post Downing Street shake-up, heralding ‘phase two’ | Politics News

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

Sep 2, 2025

Pic: PA

Starmer: This is a new phase

Sir Keir marked the shake-up with a social media video on Monday, which declared «phase two of my government starts today».

Speaking to BBC Radio 5 Live, he said he understood the public’s «frustration» – but insisted the first year of his government had been about «fixing the foundations». He said it will now go «further and faster» to deliver change.

Reports suggest the shake-up has been done with an eye on the autumn budget. Last year’s, the first by a Labour chancellor for well over a decade, was met with significant backlash – notably over the increase in national insurance contributions for employers.

Ms Reeves had already been criticised for her controversial decision to cut the winter fuel allowance for millions of pensioners, which was later reversed.

One source told The i there had been frustration over Ms Reeves’s performance, saying she «made mistakes and Keir got blamed», while a Labour MP told The Daily Telegraph the PM’s appointments were «a signal that [Ms Reeves] is in a weak position, and it’s deteriorating».

Read more from Sky News:
Cooper attempts to seize limelight from Reform
Premier League completes record-breaking window

Image:
Rachel Reeves will deliver her second budget this autumn. File pic: Reuters

‘Two-tier’ sentencing veto proposed

The government made a busy start to the new parliamentary term on Monday by announcing changes to family reunion rules for refugees in a bid to deter small boat crossings.

And Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood will be given the power to veto any changes to sentencing guidelines proposed by an independent body – over claims it amounted to «two-tier» justice.

The Sentencing Council said in April that a pre-sentence report, the results of which are taken into account when considering a criminal’s sentence, would «usually be necessary» before handing out punishment for someone from an ethnic, cultural or faith minority.

Ms Mahmood called the guidance «unacceptable» and said it amounted to «differential treatment before the law» as she urged the council to reverse it.

Under new rules announced on Tuesday, the Sentencing Council will now be unable to issue any changes without ministerial oversight, and both the justice secretary and the lady chief justice will need to give the green light.

The changes will be brought in as part of the Sentencing Bill, introduced in the House of Commons on Tuesday.

Last year’s, the first by a Labour chancellor for well over a decade, was met with significant backlash – notably over the increase in national insurance contributions for employers. Ms Reeves had already been criticized for her controversial decision to cut the winter fuel allowance for millions of pensioners, which was later reversed.

One source told The i there had been frustration over Ms Reeves’s performance, saying she «made mistakes and Keir got blamed», while a Labour MP told The Daily Telegraph the PM’s appointments were «a signal that [Ms Reeves] is in a weak position, and it’s deteriorating».

‘Two-tier’ sentencing veto proposed

The government made a busy start to the new parliamentary term on Monday by announcing changes to family reunion rules for refugees in a bid to deter small boat crossings. And Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood will be given the power to veto any changes to sentencing guidelines proposed by an independent body – over claims it amounted to «two-tier» justice.

The Sentencing Council said in April that a pre-sentence report, the results of which are taken into account when considering a criminal’s sentence, would «usually be necessary» before handing out punishment for someone from an ethnic, cultural, or faith minority. Ms Mahmood called the guidance «unacceptable» and said it amounted to «differential treatment before the law» as she urged the council to reverse it.

Under new rules announced on Tuesday, the Sentencing Council will now be unable to issue any changes without ministerial oversight, and both the justice secretary and the lady chief justice will need to give the green light. The changes will be brought in as part of the Sentencing Bill, introduced in the House of Commons on Tuesday. Last year, the first budget by a Labour chancellor in over a decade faced significant backlash, particularly due to the increase in national insurance contributions for employers. Ms. Reeves had also received criticism for cutting the winter fuel allowance for pensioners, a decision that was later reversed. Sources indicated frustration over Ms. Reeves’s performance, with one suggesting that she made mistakes and that Keir took the blame. Additionally, a Labour MP stated that the Prime Minister’s appointments signaled Ms. Reeves’s weakening position.

In other news, the government made changes to family reunion rules for refugees to deter small boat crossings. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood was granted the power to veto any proposed changes to sentencing guidelines by an independent body, following concerns of «two-tier» justice. The Sentencing Council’s guidance on considering a criminal’s background before sentencing was deemed unacceptable by Ms. Mahmood, prompting the need for ministerial oversight on future changes. These developments were part of the Sentencing Bill introduced in the House of Commons.

SOURCE

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Keir Starmer had hoped to continue his «cost of living tour» this week to address voters’ concerns in this crucial election year. However, Donald Trump’s recent Greenland threat has derailed those plans. Instead, the prime minister and his team have been engaged in discussions with European allies to formulate a response to President Trump’s bold move. The threat to impose additional tariffs on goods from several European countries has significantly escalated tensions between allies regarding Greenland, leaving many shocked and frustrated. «It’s like stepping into an alternate reality,» remarked one official. The uncertainty of whether Trump will back down has added to the anxiety surrounding the situation. Currently, efforts are being made to navigate this delicate situation through diplomatic means. The focus is on understanding the intentions of the US before hastily reacting to every social media announcement. The recent threat by Trump towards Greenland may have been triggered by a misunderstanding. The decision by European NATO members to conduct a reconnaissance mission in Greenland was misinterpreted by the White House as being directed against the US, when in fact it was aimed at Russia and China. Prime Minister Meloni of Italy suggested that there was a communication issue, and that the European initiatives were not meant to be anti-American. Allies have emphasized their commitment to Arctic security as a shared interest, with the Danish exercise Arctic Endurance being a pre-coordinated effort with Allies. The misunderstanding that may have triggered Trump’s latest Greenland threat is the belief that the US wants to work unilaterally on security in the High North, rather than through NATO with European allies. President Trump has expressed a desire to annex Greenland and use it to strengthen US security, despite reassurances from the Danes that the US could expand its security presence on the island. This unilateral approach may be seen as undermining NATO and other international institutions, as Trump also seeks to create a Board of Peace for Gaza with funding requirements for member countries. Trump’s Greenland threat stems from a misunderstanding
Conservative MP Andrew Rosindell joins Reform UK, becoming second Tory to defect
Water supply issues persist for thousands in Kent following recent outage

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

Keir Starmer had hoped to continue his «cost of living tour» this week to address voters’ concerns in this crucial election year. However, Donald Trump’s recent Greenland threat has derailed those plans. Instead, the prime minister and his team have been engaged in discussions with European allies to formulate a response to President Trump’s bold move. The threat to impose additional tariffs on goods from several European countries has significantly escalated tensions between allies regarding Greenland, leaving many shocked and frustrated. «It’s like stepping into an alternate reality,» remarked one official. The uncertainty of whether Trump will back down has added to the anxiety surrounding the situation. Currently, efforts are being made to navigate this delicate situation through diplomatic means. The focus is on understanding the intentions of the US before hastily reacting to every social media announcement. The recent threat by Trump towards Greenland may have been triggered by a misunderstanding. The decision by European NATO members to conduct a reconnaissance mission in Greenland was misinterpreted by the White House as being directed against the US, when in fact it was aimed at Russia and China. Prime Minister Meloni of Italy suggested that there was a communication issue, and that the European initiatives were not meant to be anti-American. Allies have emphasized their commitment to Arctic security as a shared interest, with the Danish exercise Arctic Endurance being a pre-coordinated effort with Allies. The misunderstanding that may have triggered Trump’s latest Greenland threat is the belief that the US wants to work unilaterally on security in the High North, rather than through NATO with European allies. President Trump has expressed a desire to annex Greenland and use it to strengthen US security, despite reassurances from the Danes that the US could expand its security presence on the island. This unilateral approach may be seen as undermining NATO and other international institutions, as Trump also seeks to create a Board of Peace for Gaza with funding requirements for member countries. Trump’s Greenland threat stems from a misunderstanding