• Lun. Ene 19th, 2026

Shawbrook explores £5bn merger with Starling Bank

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

Abr 23, 2025

Shawbrook Group, the mid-sized British lender, has made a tentative approach to Starling Bank about a £5bn merger as its owners try to avoid relying on a moribund backdrop for UK stock market listings. Sky News has learnt that Shawbrook reached out to Starling in the last two months to gauge its interest in a deal.

City sources said on Wednesday that the approach was «highly preliminary» and did not involve any detail about the proposed terms of a transaction. There are not understood to be any live discussions between the two sides, although the door has been left ajar for Shawbrook to return with a formal offer, the sources added. Money blog: Private UK island loved by Rihanna and Stormzy up for sale.

It is not the first time that Shawbrook has informally contacted Starling about a deal, and insiders said there was little visibility about whether a combination of the two banks would progress further. Nevertheless, the disclosure that Shawbrook, which is controlled by the private equity firms BC Partners and Pollen Street Capital, has broadened its sights beyond a public listing of its shares will fuel expectations of a new round of consolidation among Britain’s mid-tier lenders.

It also underlines the difficulty of taking banks public at a valuation which is attractive to their existing shareholders, given the ratings of existing listed peers. Shawbrook and its owners have examined a number of merger opportunities in the past, including exploring a merger with Metro Bank when the latter was in serious financial distress in 2023.

Just weeks earlier, Shawbrook sounded out the Co-operative Bank about a £3.5bn all-share merger in an attempt to pre-empt a wider auction of the former mutually owned lender. That was also rebuffed, with the Co-operative Bank completing its sale to the Coventry Building Society earlier this year. Sky News revealed in January that Shawbrook’s owners had hired bankers to prepare for an initial public offering in the first half of the year.

That timetable has slipped in recent months, and people close to the company dismissed recent reports that the change in the timing of an IPO was in any way connected to the market turmoil triggered by President Donald Trump’s tariffs policy. One obstacle to a merger between Shawbrook and Starling would be the valuation ascribed to the latter business by its shareholders.

Many Starling investors believe the company is worth at least £3bn and would prefer to hold out for a higher valuation as its technology platform, Engine, continues to grow. There would, however, be logic to a combination of the two banks, with both having a meaningful presence in the business lending market. BC Partners and Pollen Street Capital took Shawbrook private in 2017 after a stint on the London stock market. Starling Bank has also been repeatedly tipped as a listing candidate, although any significant merger would inevitably delay such plans.

London has been fighting to overturn the impression that its public markets have become a troubled arena for public companies, afflicted by a lack of liquidity and weaker valuations than they might attract in the US. Shawbrook, which employs close to 1,600 people, has more than 550,000 customers. Founded in 2011, it was established as a specialist savings and lending institution, providing loans for home improvement projects and weddings, as well as business and real estate lending.

It is among a crop of mid-tier lenders, including OneSavings Bank, Aldermore Bank and Paragon Bank, which have collectively become a significant part of Britain’s banking landscape since the last financial crisis. Starling Bank, meanwhile, has grown rapidly as part of a crop of digital banks which also includes Monzo. Shawbrook declined to comment on Wednesday, while Starling Bank has been contacted for comment.

SOURCE

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Asda-owner nears £275m deal to buy NCC’s Escode unit
Government to reveal major changes to merger probe process in UK
Starmer initiates resistance against Trump as president threatens tariffs over Greenland | UK News Sir Keir Starmer has decided to start pushing back against Donald Trump, who has threatened to impose tariffs on the UK and other European countries for supporting NATO allies. While not as defiant as President Macron, who vowed to stand firm against intimidation or threats, Starmer is challenging Trump’s actions. Starmer has invested significant political capital in building a relationship with Trump, despite their differences. The PM’s efforts to strengthen the special relationship, particularly in support of Ukraine, have been seen as successful. However, Trump’s accusations against the UK and European allies of playing a dangerous game in Greenland have strained the relationship. The UK’s decision to send military personnel to Greenland in solidarity with Denmark and NATO has not appeased Trump, who remains fixated on acquiring Greenland. Despite Starmer’s efforts and discussions with European leaders on Arctic security, Trump remains determined to pursue his goal. In an unusual turn of events, Starmer’s political opponents have supported his stance on Greenland and condemned Trump’s actions. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch also criticized Trump’s approach as «completely wrong.» Starmer pushes back against Trump as president threatens tariffs over Greenland

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

Keir Starmer had hoped to continue his «cost of living tour» this week to address voters’ concerns in this crucial election year. However, Donald Trump’s recent Greenland threat has derailed those plans. Instead, the prime minister and his team have been engaged in discussions with European allies to formulate a response to President Trump’s bold move. The threat to impose additional tariffs on goods from several European countries has significantly escalated tensions between allies regarding Greenland, leaving many shocked and frustrated. «It’s like stepping into an alternate reality,» remarked one official. The uncertainty of whether Trump will back down has added to the anxiety surrounding the situation. Currently, efforts are being made to navigate this delicate situation through diplomatic means. The focus is on understanding the intentions of the US before hastily reacting to every social media announcement. The recent threat by Trump towards Greenland may have been triggered by a misunderstanding. The decision by European NATO members to conduct a reconnaissance mission in Greenland was misinterpreted by the White House as being directed against the US, when in fact it was aimed at Russia and China. Prime Minister Meloni of Italy suggested that there was a communication issue, and that the European initiatives were not meant to be anti-American. Allies have emphasized their commitment to Arctic security as a shared interest, with the Danish exercise Arctic Endurance being a pre-coordinated effort with Allies. The misunderstanding that may have triggered Trump’s latest Greenland threat is the belief that the US wants to work unilaterally on security in the High North, rather than through NATO with European allies. President Trump has expressed a desire to annex Greenland and use it to strengthen US security, despite reassurances from the Danes that the US could expand its security presence on the island. This unilateral approach may be seen as undermining NATO and other international institutions, as Trump also seeks to create a Board of Peace for Gaza with funding requirements for member countries. Trump’s Greenland threat stems from a misunderstanding