• Lun. Ene 19th, 2026

Nine-year-old girl traumatised after being shot with airgun in racially aggravated assault

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

Sep 17, 2025
Chakeshill Drive, Brentry, Bristol

Police have appealed for the public’s help after a nine-year-old child was shot with an airgun in what they said was a racially aggravated assault.

The reported shooting happened at around 1.30pm in Chakeshill Drive, in the Brentry area of Bristol, earlier this month, Avon and Somerset Police said on Wednesday.

The force said it wants to locate a white male aged either 17 or 18, around 5ft 11in tall, with dark blonde hair and a slim face.

Donald Trump state visit – latest

On the day of the attack, he was wearing a distinctive blue padded coat and riding a black electric scooter with white writing, it said.

The girl, who was hit three times by a pellet during the incident, was left feeling sore, but not seriously injured.

A racial comment was also made during the incident on 2 September, leaving the child traumatised and is too scared to leave the house.

A second offender is also believed to have been involved.

The victim and her family have been referred to Stand Against Racism and Inequality (SARI) for support, Avon and Somerset Police said in a statement.

The force said has made CCTV and house-to-house enquiries.

Read more on Sky News:
Appeal over one in, one out scheme
Hatton ‘in good place’ – family
Dangerous fake dolls seized

Neighbourhood policing chief inspector Keith Smith called it a «deeply troubling incident» and it has launched reassurance patrols in the area.

«We do believe this to be an isolated incident and would encourage anyone with pertinent information to come forward,» he said, calling for witnesses and anyone with dashcam, CCTV, or doorbell footage of the incident to come forward.

SOURCE

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Keir Starmer had hoped to continue his «cost of living tour» this week to address voters’ concerns in this crucial election year. However, Donald Trump’s recent Greenland threat has derailed those plans. Instead, the prime minister and his team have been engaged in discussions with European allies to formulate a response to President Trump’s bold move. The threat to impose additional tariffs on goods from several European countries has significantly escalated tensions between allies regarding Greenland, leaving many shocked and frustrated. «It’s like stepping into an alternate reality,» remarked one official. The uncertainty of whether Trump will back down has added to the anxiety surrounding the situation. Currently, efforts are being made to navigate this delicate situation through diplomatic means. The focus is on understanding the intentions of the US before hastily reacting to every social media announcement. The recent threat by Trump towards Greenland may have been triggered by a misunderstanding. The decision by European NATO members to conduct a reconnaissance mission in Greenland was misinterpreted by the White House as being directed against the US, when in fact it was aimed at Russia and China. Prime Minister Meloni of Italy suggested that there was a communication issue, and that the European initiatives were not meant to be anti-American. Allies have emphasized their commitment to Arctic security as a shared interest, with the Danish exercise Arctic Endurance being a pre-coordinated effort with Allies. The misunderstanding that may have triggered Trump’s latest Greenland threat is the belief that the US wants to work unilaterally on security in the High North, rather than through NATO with European allies. President Trump has expressed a desire to annex Greenland and use it to strengthen US security, despite reassurances from the Danes that the US could expand its security presence on the island. This unilateral approach may be seen as undermining NATO and other international institutions, as Trump also seeks to create a Board of Peace for Gaza with funding requirements for member countries. Trump’s Greenland threat stems from a misunderstanding
Conservative MP Andrew Rosindell joins Reform UK, becoming second Tory to defect
Water supply issues persist for thousands in Kent following recent outage

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

Keir Starmer had hoped to continue his «cost of living tour» this week to address voters’ concerns in this crucial election year. However, Donald Trump’s recent Greenland threat has derailed those plans. Instead, the prime minister and his team have been engaged in discussions with European allies to formulate a response to President Trump’s bold move. The threat to impose additional tariffs on goods from several European countries has significantly escalated tensions between allies regarding Greenland, leaving many shocked and frustrated. «It’s like stepping into an alternate reality,» remarked one official. The uncertainty of whether Trump will back down has added to the anxiety surrounding the situation. Currently, efforts are being made to navigate this delicate situation through diplomatic means. The focus is on understanding the intentions of the US before hastily reacting to every social media announcement. The recent threat by Trump towards Greenland may have been triggered by a misunderstanding. The decision by European NATO members to conduct a reconnaissance mission in Greenland was misinterpreted by the White House as being directed against the US, when in fact it was aimed at Russia and China. Prime Minister Meloni of Italy suggested that there was a communication issue, and that the European initiatives were not meant to be anti-American. Allies have emphasized their commitment to Arctic security as a shared interest, with the Danish exercise Arctic Endurance being a pre-coordinated effort with Allies. The misunderstanding that may have triggered Trump’s latest Greenland threat is the belief that the US wants to work unilaterally on security in the High North, rather than through NATO with European allies. President Trump has expressed a desire to annex Greenland and use it to strengthen US security, despite reassurances from the Danes that the US could expand its security presence on the island. This unilateral approach may be seen as undermining NATO and other international institutions, as Trump also seeks to create a Board of Peace for Gaza with funding requirements for member countries. Trump’s Greenland threat stems from a misunderstanding