• Lun. Ene 19th, 2026

Legal action against Johnson & Johnson in UK over cancer claims

Michael Bunting

PorMichael Bunting

Oct 16, 2025
Johnson & Johnson denies its baby powder contained asbestos. Pic: Reuters

Johnson & Johnson (J&J) is currently facing legal action from thousands of individuals in the UK who are alleging that the global healthcare giant knowingly sold talcum powder contaminated with asbestos. More than 3,000 people claim that they or a family member developed ovarian cancer or mesothelioma from using Johnson’s baby powder between 1965 and 2023.

A lawsuit has been initiated by KP Law at the High Court in London seeking damages against J&J and Kenvue UK, which separated from the former in 2023 and now functions as an independent entity. The lawsuit contends that J&J’s product was tainted with carcinogenic fibers, including asbestos, and that the company concealed this risk from the public for many years. J&J ceased selling talc-based baby powder in the US in 2020, transitioning to a cornstarch product, and replicated this globally in 2023.

Kenvue has released a statement asserting that J&J baby powder did not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. Meanwhile, J&J is confronted with tens of thousands of lawsuits in the United States, where plaintiffs claim they were diagnosed with cancer after using baby powder and other talc products. Recently, J&J was directed to pay $966 million (£720 million) to the family of a woman who passed away from mesothelioma, marking one of the largest judgments against the company, although the sum might be subject to reduction upon appeal.

The legal claim being made revolves around the assertion that talc, a naturally occurring mineral, typically contains asbestos. Michael Rawlinson KC, representing the claimants, contends that very few, if any, commercially exploited talc deposits worldwide are free from asbestos. He further alleges that J&J was aware of the asbestos contamination through reports from mines, its own research, and existing scientific literature. Rawlinson claims that the company suppressed information indicating asbestos contamination in baby powder, lobbied regulators to permit continued sales, and sponsored studies to downplay health risks.

Janet Fuschillo, a claimant, disclosed that she was diagnosed with ovarian cancer seven years ago and had been using J&J’s baby powder since the 1960s. Patricia Angell shared that her husband Edward passed away in 2006 from mesothelioma, with talc mentioned in his autopsy report along with asbestos strains found in contaminated talc. Mesothelioma, a type of cancer, is predominantly caused by asbestos exposure, typically affecting the lungs after inhaling microscopic fibers.

A spokesperson from Kenvue expressed sympathy for individuals battling cancer and emphasized the safety of Johnson’s baby powder, highlighting extensive testing by independent laboratories, universities, and health authorities worldwide. The spokesperson affirmed that the cosmetic-grade talc used in Johnson’s baby powder adhered to regulatory standards, was asbestos-free, and does not cause cancer.

SOURCE

Michael Bunting

Por Michael Bunting

“I’m Michael Bunting, Communications Director with over 20 years of experience in corporate reputation, crisis management, and digital strategy. I have led teams in multinational companies and agencies, advised executives, and designed high-impact strategies. I am driven by transparency, innovation, and leveraging communication as a competitive advantage.”

Asda-owner nears £275m deal to buy NCC’s Escode unit
Government to reveal major changes to merger probe process in UK
Starmer initiates resistance against Trump as president threatens tariffs over Greenland | UK News Sir Keir Starmer has decided to start pushing back against Donald Trump, who has threatened to impose tariffs on the UK and other European countries for supporting NATO allies. While not as defiant as President Macron, who vowed to stand firm against intimidation or threats, Starmer is challenging Trump’s actions. Starmer has invested significant political capital in building a relationship with Trump, despite their differences. The PM’s efforts to strengthen the special relationship, particularly in support of Ukraine, have been seen as successful. However, Trump’s accusations against the UK and European allies of playing a dangerous game in Greenland have strained the relationship. The UK’s decision to send military personnel to Greenland in solidarity with Denmark and NATO has not appeased Trump, who remains fixated on acquiring Greenland. Despite Starmer’s efforts and discussions with European leaders on Arctic security, Trump remains determined to pursue his goal. In an unusual turn of events, Starmer’s political opponents have supported his stance on Greenland and condemned Trump’s actions. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch also criticized Trump’s approach as «completely wrong.» Starmer pushes back against Trump as president threatens tariffs over Greenland

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

You missed

Keir Starmer had hoped to continue his «cost of living tour» this week to address voters’ concerns in this crucial election year. However, Donald Trump’s recent Greenland threat has derailed those plans. Instead, the prime minister and his team have been engaged in discussions with European allies to formulate a response to President Trump’s bold move. The threat to impose additional tariffs on goods from several European countries has significantly escalated tensions between allies regarding Greenland, leaving many shocked and frustrated. «It’s like stepping into an alternate reality,» remarked one official. The uncertainty of whether Trump will back down has added to the anxiety surrounding the situation. Currently, efforts are being made to navigate this delicate situation through diplomatic means. The focus is on understanding the intentions of the US before hastily reacting to every social media announcement. The recent threat by Trump towards Greenland may have been triggered by a misunderstanding. The decision by European NATO members to conduct a reconnaissance mission in Greenland was misinterpreted by the White House as being directed against the US, when in fact it was aimed at Russia and China. Prime Minister Meloni of Italy suggested that there was a communication issue, and that the European initiatives were not meant to be anti-American. Allies have emphasized their commitment to Arctic security as a shared interest, with the Danish exercise Arctic Endurance being a pre-coordinated effort with Allies. The misunderstanding that may have triggered Trump’s latest Greenland threat is the belief that the US wants to work unilaterally on security in the High North, rather than through NATO with European allies. President Trump has expressed a desire to annex Greenland and use it to strengthen US security, despite reassurances from the Danes that the US could expand its security presence on the island. This unilateral approach may be seen as undermining NATO and other international institutions, as Trump also seeks to create a Board of Peace for Gaza with funding requirements for member countries. Trump’s Greenland threat stems from a misunderstanding